Photocurable 3D-Printed Building Panels for Structural Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing technologies for building construction face challenges such as material limitations, particularly with concrete, which lacks thermal efficiency, requires manual reinforcement, and has long curing times, limiting the ability to create load-bearing walls and complex structures efficiently, and is restricted by the size of the printer, resulting in limited design flexibility and verticality.

Innovation Solution

The use of photocurable composite materials for 3D printing, which hardens under UV light, allowing for the creation of solid monolithic structures with improved compressive and tensile strength, enabling the production of 3D-printed integrated building panel systems that can form multi-story structures without traditional construction materials, incorporating load transfer components and connectors for enhanced structural performance and thermal efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If concrete is used for 3D printing building structures, then structural mass and compressive strength are achieved, but thermal efficiency deteriorates and curing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressive strengthVSAvoidcuring time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from traditional concrete to photopolymer composite material that cures through UV light exposure. This parameter change reduces curing time from days to minutes while maintaining structural strength, directly resolving the time-strength contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite materials (photopolymer resin with filler particles) that combine the benefits of rapid curing with structural integrity. The composite formulation enables both fast setting and adequate compressive strength, resolving the contradiction between speed and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If concrete is used for load-bearing walls, then structural integrity is achieved, but manual reinforcement is required increasing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidreinforcement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical reinforcement system (steel rebar embedded in concrete) with a monolithic photopolymer structure that achieves structural integrity through material properties and geometric design. This substitution eliminates the need for manual reinforcement installation, reducing complexity while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The photopolymer material and printing process inherently provide structural integrity without requiring separate reinforcement steps. The material self-cures and self-supports during printing, eliminating the need for external reinforcement systems and manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If on-site 3D printing is used, then construction automation is improved, but setup and calibration time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction automationVSAvoidsetup and calibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs preliminary action by pre-calibrating the printing system during manufacturing and pre-positioning support structures before printing begins. This preliminary preparation reduces on-site setup time and enables faster automation deployment, resolving the contradiction between automation benefit and setup overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If traditional construction materials are used, then structural performance is achieved, but construction time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural performanceVSAvoidconstruction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental material parameter from slow-curing concrete to rapid-curing photopolymer, reducing construction time from months to days while maintaining structural performance. This parameter change directly resolves the productivity-reliability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The photopolymer printing process enables continuous deposition and curing without the interruptions required by concrete (curing waits, reinforcement installation stops). This continuous printing action dramatically increases productivity while maintaining structural integrity through uninterrupted layer bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces construction time and costs, allows for the creation of complex geometries and multi-story structures, and meets performance requirements for structural integrity, thermal efficiency, and waterproofing, while eliminating the need for manual reinforcement and long curing times.

Implementation Method 1

The use of photocurable composite materials for 3D printing, which hardens under UV light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20240376710A13d-printed integrated building panel systems
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 MIGHTY BUILDINGS INC
  • US20240376710A1 patent drawing
  • US20240376710A1 patent drawing
  • US20240376710A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A 3D-printed integrated building panel system configured to form a portion of an overall building can include 3D-printed building panels, connectors, and one or more load transfer components. Each 3D-printed building panel can be formed by 3D printing technology using a photocurable composite material, and at least a portion of the 3D-printed building panels can be integrally formed. The connectors can be coupled to one or more of the 3D-printed building panels and can couple the 3D-printed building panels to each other and/or to one or more separate building components of the overall building. The load transfer component(s) can be coupled to at least a portion of the 3D-printed building panels and can transfer loads across the 3D-printed building panels. The load transfer component(s) can be configured to form at least a portion of an overall super structure for the overall building.