Photomask Modeling With Image-Based ANN for Faster SEM Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current photomask manufacturing process modeling is time-consuming and expensive, requiring extensive effort from multiple engineers and is difficult to scale, as it involves complex mathematical and statistical methods that are limited by existing software tools, and often struggles with unforeseen effects.

Innovation Solution

An image-based Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) method is used to model photomask manufacturing, where a training phase builds an image-based ANN model by iteratively comparing predicted and actual SEM images, allowing for efficient prediction and correction of circuit shapes on photomasks, reducing the need for extensive measurement derivation and mathematical parameter updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mathematical and statistical methods are used to build photomask manufacturing models, then model accuracy can be achieved, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and requires extensive effort from multiple engineers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidmodel building time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mathematical and statistical modeling methods with a neural network-based system. The neural network automatically learns patterns from SEM images and layout data, substituting the manual mathematical modeling process with an automated learning system that requires minimal human intervention while maintaining or improving model accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network system is self-training, automatically learning from provided data without requiring extensive manual parameter tuning or expert intervention. The system derives its own modeling parameters from training data, making the process self-service oriented and dramatically reducing the time and expertise required compared to traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional modeling methods are used, then existing software tools can be leveraged, but the system cannot handle unforeseen effects and requires extensive manual updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware tool availabilityVSAvoidhandling unforeseen effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network dynamically adjusts its internal parameters (weights and biases) based on training data, allowing it to adapt to various manufacturing effects automatically. This parameter learning capability enables the system to handle unforeseen effects by learning their patterns from data, rather than requiring pre-programmed mathematical models for each effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network provides a universal modeling framework that can handle multiple types of photomask manufacturing effects simultaneously. Rather than requiring separate specialized tools for different effects, the single neural network system can model various effects by learning from diverse training data, improving versatility while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If SEM images are used for measurements, then accurate manufacturing data can be obtained, but the process becomes complex and costly requiring experienced engineers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing data accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of SEM images during the training phase, automatically extracting relevant features and patterns before the actual modeling occurs. This preliminary action automates what would otherwise require manual measurement and analysis by experienced engineers, reducing both complexity and cost while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network acts as an intermediary between raw SEM images and the final manufacturing model. Instead of requiring engineers to manually interpret SEM images and derive measurements, the neural network automatically processes the images and extracts meaningful data, simplifying the measurement process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional modeling approaches are used, then established methods can be followed, but scaling the process to new circuits becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess established methodsVSAvoidscaling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network model is dynamic and can be retrained or fine-tuned for new circuits by simply providing new training data. Unlike static mathematical models that require complete redevelopment for new circuits, the neural network adapts dynamically to new manufacturing conditions and circuit types, dramatically improving scaling efficiency while maintaining ease of use through its flexible architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11022966B1Method of modeling e-beam photomask manufacturing process using image-based artificial neural networks
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US11022966B1 patent drawing
  • US11022966B1 patent drawing
  • US11022966B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image-based Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) is used for photomask modeling, which can self-construct an internal representation of the photomask manufacturing process, therefore allowing the modeling process to become unfettered by the limitations of existing mathematical/statistical tools, thus greatly reduces/eliminates the effort needed from tedious and costly model-builders. The ANN model requires mask layout data converted into image pixel form. In ANN training phase a first circuit image and its existing SEM image are modeled via multiple layers of convolution and rectification to pick out the salient features of transformed image. In ANN testing phase, a second circuit image and its existing SEM image are compared and verified to have a difference smaller than the predetermined requirement. The satisfactory second circuit image is converted back from pixel form to circuit layout data for photomask writing.