Photomask Inspection Using Optical Simulation and Contour Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mask inspection methods are inadequate for accurately detecting defects in photomasks due to their reliance on indirect verification of printed features on wafers, which can be labor-intensive and time-consuming, and do not effectively distinguish between mask-related and resist-related issues, leading to inefficient process control and reduced yield.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system and method for inspecting photomasks by emulating lithographic tool optics to generate images of mask features, estimating contours, identifying reference contours, and measuring deviations to detect edge displacements and other defects directly on the mask, using actinic or non-actinic inspection tools with optional simulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If indirect verification of printed features on wafers is used, then defect detection can be performed, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs mask inspection before the lithography printing process to detect defects early. By examining the mask directly using optical simulation that mimics the lithographic tool's point spread function, defects are identified in advance, eliminating the need for time-consuming post-printing verification on wafers and enabling early defect detection that prevents multiple defective devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If indirect verification of printed features is used, then defects can be detected, but it is difficult to distinguish between mask-related and resist-related issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoiddefect source identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the defect detection process into mask-specific inspection and process-specific analysis. By directly examining the mask with optical simulation and comparing against a simulated perfect mask image, the system isolates mask defects from resist or printing process issues. This segmentation enables precise attribution of defects to the mask itself, separating mask-related problems from resist-related issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an optical simulation model as an intermediary that mimics the lithographic tool's point spread function. This simulation creates a reference image of how a perfect mask would appear under the same optical conditions, enabling direct comparison and accurate identification of actual mask defects without contamination from resist or printing process variables

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If direct mask inspection is performed, then defect detection accuracy improves, but the complexity of the inspection system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates an optical copy or simulation of the lithographic printing process by modeling the point spread function and generating a simulated mask image. This computational copy allows direct mask inspection with high accuracy by comparing the actual mask image against the simulated perfect mask image, achieving defect detection precision comparable to direct lithographic inspection without requiring the full complexity of a lithographic tool

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances defect detection accuracy and sensitivity, improving process control without affecting throughput, enabling early identification of defects that would otherwise cause multiple defective devices.

Implementation Method 1

obtain a first image representative of at least part of the mask, wherein the first image is acquired by emulating optical configuration of a lithographic tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical diffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

emulating optical configuration of a lithographic tool usable for fabrication of the semiconductor specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS12400314B2Mask inspection for semiconductor specimen fabrication
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 APPL MATERIALS ISRAEL LTD
  • US12400314B2 patent drawing
  • US12400314B2 patent drawing
  • US12400314B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a system and method of a method of mask inspection, comprising: obtaining a first image representative of at least part of the mask; applying a printing threshold on the first image to obtain a second image; estimating a contour for each structural element of interest (SEI) of a group of SEIs, and extracting a set of attributes characterizing the contour, giving rise to a group of contours corresponding to the group of SEIs and respective sets of attributes associated therewith; for each given contour, identifying, among the remaining contours in the group of contours, one or more reference contours similar to the given contour, by comparing between the respective sets of attributes associated therewith; and measuring a deviation between the given contour and each reference contour thereof, giving rise to one or more measured deviations indicative of whether a defect is present.