Photomask Layout Correction for EUV Pattern Fidelity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mask manufacturing technologies face challenges in achieving enhanced pattern fidelity and consistency for advanced integrated circuit technology nodes, particularly in EUVL and optical lithography, due to issues like critical dimension uniformity, corner rounding, and sub-resolution assist features, which conventional tools struggle to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing Litho Aware Mask Process correction Application (LAMA) techniques, involving spatial domain analysis and SEM image contour extraction, to enhance photomask manufacturing by identifying and correcting defects through a multi-step data flow that harmonizes mask and wafer processes, applying corrective photomask structures to improve pattern fidelity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional mask manufacturing tools and methods are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but pattern fidelity and manufacturing precision deteriorate at advanced technology nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern fidelityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mask manufacturing process is segmented into multiple distinct stages: initial mask creation, SEM imaging, contour extraction, defect analysis, corrective structure generation, and verification. Each stage produces specific data that feeds into the next, allowing complex corrections to be applied systematically without overwhelming the manufacturing system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Corrective photomask structures are generated and applied before final mask manufacturing. The system performs preliminary defect analysis on SEM images, generates correction patterns, and incorporates them into the mask design before production, preventing defect propagation to the final product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 3:

The system creates digital copies of mask contours from SEM images and generates virtual corrective structures in the digital domain. These digital corrections are then applied to the mask layout before physical manufacturing, allowing verification and optimization without affecting actual mask production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If mask process corrections are applied to enhance pattern fidelity, then lithographic performance improves, but process time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelithographic performanceVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated defect detection, analysis, and correction generation without requiring extensive manual intervention. Algorithms automatically extract contours from SEM images, identify defect patterns, generate corrective structures, and apply them to mask layouts, reducing both time and human resource requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses SEM imaging to obtain feedback on actual mask structures, compares them against design specifications, and generates corrections based on detected deviations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures corrections are targeted and effective, reducing the number of iterative cycles needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional single-beam writing tools are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates for EUVL requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEUVL mask precisionVSAvoidtool capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameters of conventional single-beam writing tools by implementing multi-pass writing strategies and dynamic parameter adjustment during mask manufacturing. This allows existing tools to achieve EUVL-level precision without requiring complete tool replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The mask manufacturing process incorporates dynamic parameter adjustment where writing conditions, beam parameters, and correction application timing are optimized in real-time based on detected defect patterns and structure complexity, enabling conventional tools to adapt to advanced precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4143637B1System and method for manufacturing a photomask
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 PHOTRONICS INC
  • EP4143637B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4143637B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4143637B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Methods and systems for building a photomask from obtained pattern information relating to a photomask that exhibits defects on wafer. Spatial domain analysis is conducted on the pattern information so that corrective photomask structures can be generated and applied to a photomask layout. A photomask is built using the corrective photomask structures. The photomask is verified for effectiveness.