Photon-Counting Radiation Detector With Boundary Macro Pixel Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing photon counting detectors in radiographic imaging systems experience sensitivity differences between pixels due to varying pixel sizes and high incident photon rates, leading to reduced image quality and inadequate correction methods.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a collimator with walls forming passage holes and grouping subpixels into macro pixels, where pixels near module ends are smaller and follow an arithmetic progression, reducing sensitivity differences by minimizing pixel size variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If pixels in the boundary area are made smaller to maintain pixel pitch continuity, then pixel pitch continuity is improved, but sensitivity difference between pixels increases due to different pixel sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepixel pitch continuityVSAvoidsensitivity uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making pixels in the boundary area smaller than pixels in the non-boundary area. This local differentiation maintains pixel pitch continuity at module boundaries while the patent subsequently compensates for the resulting sensitivity differences through signal processing corrections based on pixel size and aperture ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If the gap between modules is narrowed to reduce pixel size reduction in the boundary area, then sensitivity difference is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases due to tolerance design constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity uniformityVSAvoidtolerance design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of pixel size in the boundary area to be smaller than in the non-boundary area. This parameter change allows the pixel pitch to remain continuous across module boundaries. The patent then compensates for the sensitivity difference caused by this parameter change through signal processing corrections, rather than attempting to eliminate the gap between modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If correction for output signal is applied depending on pixel size ratio, then pixel pitch continuity is maintained, but sensitivity difference remains inadequate at high incident photon rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepixel pitch continuityVSAvoidsensitivity uniformity at high photon rates
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by correcting the output signal based on the pixel size and aperture ratio. The correction amount is determined by the product of pixel size and aperture ratio, which compensates for the sensitivity differences caused by varying pixel sizes. This feedback mechanism ensures uniform sensitivity across all pixels even at high incident photon rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces sensitivity differences between pixels, ensuring uniform sensitivity and improved image quality even at high photon rates, while allowing for practical manufacturing and cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

a semiconductor layer that generates electrical charges depending on photon energy of the radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a collimator that is disposed between the radiation source and the semiconductor layer, and has a plurality of walls forming a plurality of passage holes through which the radiation passes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation absorption and geometric shadowing: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12405231B2Radiographic imaging apparatus and radiation detector
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US12405231B2 patent drawing
  • US12405231B2 patent drawing
  • US12405231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiographic imaging apparatus and a radiation detector are provided, which are capable of sufficiently reducing the sensitivity difference between pixels even if the incident photon rate is high. A radiographic imaging apparatus includes: a radiation source for irradiating an object with radiation; a plurality of detection element modules each having a semiconductor layer that generates electrical charges depending on photon energy of the radiation, and a photon counting circuit for counting the electrical charges for each pixel; and a collimator that is disposed between the radiation source and the semiconductor layer, and has a plurality of walls forming a plurality of passage holes through which the radiation passes. A plurality of subpixels is formed on the semiconductor layer, and when one or more subpixels defined by the walls of the collimator are grouped as a macro pixel, a plurality of macro pixels arranged from each end of each of the detection element modules is smaller in size than a macro pixel other than the plurality of macro pixels arranged from the end of the detection element module.