Photon-Counting Detector Correction Using Air Scans for Drift Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Photon-counting CT systems face challenges in maintaining accurate detector response due to environmental drifts and pileup effects, leading to degraded image quality and the need for frequent, labor-intensive recalibrations.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for detector response correction in photon-counting CT systems that utilize frequent air scans to monitor and correct detector response drifts, applying pixel-by-pixel and energy-bin-by-energy-bin corrections, reducing the need for full recalibrations and maintaining image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If frequent full recalibrations are performed to maintain accurate detector response, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate due to labor-intensive procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector response accuracyVSAvoidsystem downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process is segmented into two distinct parts: (1) an initial comprehensive full calibration performed periodically, and (2) frequent rapid air scan-based corrections performed between full calibrations. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision through frequent corrections while minimizing time loss by using the fast air scan method rather than performing full recalibrations frequently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A full calibration is performed in advance to establish baseline correction factors and detector response characteristics. These pre-determined correction factors are then applied during subsequent air scans and object scans, eliminating the need to perform time-consuming full recalibrations frequently while maintaining accurate detector response correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If full calibration procedures are performed frequently to correct detector drift, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to system downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoidscan throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system is segmented into a comprehensive full calibration mode for periodic reliability assurance and a rapid air scan correction mode for frequent maintenance. This allows the system to maintain image quality consistency through frequent corrections while preserving scan throughput by using the rapid air scan method that takes only a fraction of the time of full calibration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction by automatically executing air scans and applying correction factors to detector data without requiring manual intervention or full calibration procedures. This self-service capability maintains reliability through continuous correction while preserving productivity by eliminating the need for frequent manual recalibration operations that would cause system downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If air scans are performed frequently to monitor detector drift, then measurement precision is maintained, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector response monitoring accuracyVSAvoidX-ray tube energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing complete calibration scans with multiple attenuation materials, the system performs partial action using only air scans that measure the detector response without the attenuating object. This partial measurement approach maintains detector response monitoring accuracy while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to full calibration procedures, as air scans require minimal X-ray exposure and no additional calibration materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces system downtime while preserving image quality by continuously correcting detector response, ensuring high-quality images without extensive recalibration procedures.

Implementation Method 1

the semiconductor-based detector using direct conversion is designed to resolve the energy of the individual incoming photons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

A radiation source, such as an X-ray tube, irradiates the body of the imaging object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBremsstrahlung:

Implementation Method 3

at high X-ray flux rates indicative of clinical X-ray imaging, multiple X-ray detection events on a single detector can occur within the detector's time response, a phenomenon called pileup

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPulse Pile-up:

Data Source

PatentUS20260033791A1Detector response correction method and apparatus for a photon counting x-ray imaging system
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 CANON KK
  • US20260033791A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033791A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033791A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing detector response correction in an X-ray imaging system having a photon-counting detector is disclosed. The method includes obtaining calibration data stored in a calibration data storage, which is generated during a calibration procedure performed with the X-ray imaging system at a first time. The method also includes acquiring air scan data generated through an air scan performed with the X-ray imaging system at a second time after the first time. The method further includes performing, with the X-ray imaging system, an object scan on an imaging object at a third time to generate object scan data. The third time is after the second time. The method further includes performing, using the generated object scan data, detector response correction based on the acquired air scan data and the obtained calibration data, and reconstructing, based on the performed detector response correction, an image of the imaging object.