Photonic Crystal Waveguide Anti-Coupling Substrate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic-photonic devices face optical loss due to evanescent coupling between the inner core and the substrate, which disrupts the propagation of optical signals, particularly in integrated circuits where materials with similar refractive indices can couple and attract optical signals away from the waveguide.

Innovation Solution

A photonic device is designed with an anti-coupling area in the substrate that extends below the inner core and cladding layer, featuring a plurality of holes to reduce coupling, and can also function as a photonic crystal with a customizable photonic bandgap, using materials with refractive indices equal to or less than the outer cladding material to minimize optical leakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If materials with refractive index matching the inner core are used in the substrate, then manufacturing is simplified, but optical coupling loss increases due to evanescent coupling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate material selectionVSAvoidoptical signal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an anti-coupling layer as an intermediary between the substrate and the waveguide core. This layer has a refractive index lower than both the substrate and the core, acting as a buffer that prevents direct evanescent coupling while allowing the substrate to maintain its simple, low-cost material composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a specific material property (low refractive index) locally at the interface between substrate and waveguide, rather than requiring the entire substrate to have special properties. This localized approach maintains ease of manufacture for the bulk substrate while addressing optical coupling only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If the waveguide structure is simplified without additional anti-coupling structures, then device complexity is reduced, but optical propagation reliability deteriorates due to coupling loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaveguide structureVSAvoidoptical signal propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-coupling layer serves as a mediator that decouples the optical fields between substrate and core, preventing signal loss without requiring complex active control mechanisms or additional optical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the refractive index parameter of the layer adjacent to the substrate, creating a gradient or step change that optimizes optical confinement. This parameter change is achieved through material selection rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a photonic crystal structure with periodic holes is implemented, then photonic bandgap functionality is achieved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephotonic bandgap customizationVSAvoidhole periodicity and dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The photonic crystal structure divides the waveguide core into periodic segments with holes, creating a segmented pattern that produces the photonic bandgap effect through constructive and destructive interference of light waves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves photonic bandgap functionality by changing the geometric parameters (hole size, spacing, pattern) rather than requiring complex material compositions or additional processing steps, allowing optimization within standard manufacturing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The anti-coupling area effectively mitigates optical coupling between the inner core and the substrate, reducing potential propagation loss and allowing unencumbered electromagnetic wave propagation, while the photonic crystal functionality provides a customizable bandgap for enhanced performance and efficiency in electronic-photonic devices.

Implementation Method 1

optical loss due to evanescent coupling between the inner core and the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvanescent coupling:

Implementation Method 2

photonic crystals can provide a photonic bandgap for electromagnetic waves, where the presence of particular wavelengths is blocked

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotonic bandgap: Photonic Crystal

Implementation Method 3

Wave guiding occurs upon internal reflection of electromagnetic waves at the interface between the higher refractive index inner core and the lower refractive index outer cladding material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInternal reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP2805192B1Photonic crystal waveguide with reduced coupling loss towards the substrate
Publication Date: 2019.06.19 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • EP2805192B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2805192B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2805192B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A photonic device and methods of formation that provide an area providing reduced optical coupling between a substrate and an inner core of the photonic device are described. The area is formed using holes in the inner core and an outer cladding. The holes may be filled with materials which provide a photonic crystal. Thus, the photonic device may function as a waveguide and as a photonic crystal.