Inverse Design of Photonic Devices Using Signed Distance Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for designing photonic devices, such as those used in optical communication, are inefficient and costly due to the high number of design parameters and the reliance on manual or simple optimization methods, which limits their performance, size, and robustness.

Innovation Solution

The use of a computer-implemented method for designing photonic devices through an inverse design process, which involves generating an initial design based on a specification, determining signed distance fields, calculating structural parameters, simulating performance, and updating features using fabrication and performance loss values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual or simple optimization methods are used for designing photonic devices, then the design process is simpler to implement, but the performance, size, and robustness of the devices are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual optimization methods with an automated inverse design system that uses machine learning models and computational algorithms to optimize photonic device parameters, transitioning from mechanical/manual adjustment to computational automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes a large number of design parameters simultaneously by transforming the design space into a lower-dimensional latent space where parameters can be efficiently adjusted and optimized through machine learning, enabling comprehensive parameter optimization without exponential complexity increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a large number of design parameters are optimized, then device performance improves, but the computational complexity and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice robustnessVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training of machine learning models using pre-generated datasets from finite element simulations, creating a trained model that can rapidly evaluate design parameters without requiring full simulations during the optimization process, thus reducing design time while maintaining optimization comprehensiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the high-dimensional design parameter space into a lower-dimensional latent space using autoencoders and neural networks, allowing optimization of many parameters simultaneously by working in a compressed representation where computational complexity is reduced while preserving the essential design characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If traditional design methods are used, then the design process is faster to complete, but the resulting devices have larger size and inferior performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign efficiencyVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes geometric and material parameters of the photonic device structure through machine learning to achieve superior performance in compact form factors, allowing smaller device size while maintaining or improving performance through intelligent parameter optimization rather than traditional scaling approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250036843A1Using signed distance functions to evaluate fabricability of photonic devices during an inverse design process
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 X DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US20250036843A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036843A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036843A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a computer-implemented method for designing a physical device is provided. A computing system generates an initial design based on a design specification. The initial design includes a list of features, and each feature of the list of features represents a convex shape. The computing system determines a set of signed distance fields that includes a signed distance field for each feature of the list of features, and determines a set of structural parameters using the set of signed distance fields. The computing system simulates performance of the initial design using the set of structural parameters to determine a performance loss value. The computing system determines at least one fabrication loss value using the set of signed distance fields. The computing system updates at least one feature of the list of features using the at least one fabrication loss value and a gradient of the performance loss value.