Photoreactive 3D Printing With Closed-Loop Force Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional photoreactive 3D printing systems operate in an open loop manner with fixed process settings, leading to poor product quality and inefficiencies, and manual optimization methods are ineffective in translating optimal conditions during development to final production, often resulting in scrap and lost machine time.

Innovation Solution

Implement a closed loop feedback system with integrated sensors to monitor and adjust print parameters in real-time, using a print recipe that can be updated during the printing process based on sensor input, including membrane tension, resin temperature, and platform movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional open loop printing with fixed process settings is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control systemVSAvoidpart quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where sensors continuously monitor printing parameters (resin temperature, platform position, illumination intensity) and the controller dynamically adjusts process settings based on real-time feedback. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining simple hardware architecture while achieving high precision through intelligent feedback control, transforming the open-loop fixed-setting system into a closed-loop adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static fixed process settings to dynamic adaptive control where printing parameters are continuously optimized during the printing process. The system dynamically adjusts exposure time, platform velocity, and resin flow rates based on real-time sensor data, enabling the same system to adapt to varying print jobs and conditions without increasing physical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If manual optimization for each print job is performed, then manufacturing precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint process optimizationVSAvoidprocess development time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the printing system to automatically optimize its own process parameters without manual intervention. The closed-loop control system self-adjusts printing parameters based on sensor feedback, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error optimization for each print job. This resolves the contradiction by automating the optimization process, achieving high precision while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary calibration and characterization of printing parameters that are stored as reference data. Before actual printing, the system retrieves pre-determined optimal parameters and quickly adapts them using real-time feedback, avoiding the need for extensive manual optimization for each new print job while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If trial and error approach is used for process optimization, then manufacturing precision slightly improves, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidresin waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses real-time sensor feedback to monitor resin consumption and printing quality simultaneously. The controller adjusts printing parameters to maintain optimal quality while minimizing resin usage, preventing the excessive resin waste associated with manual trial-and-error optimization. This resolves the contradiction by enabling precise control that reduces material waste while achieving high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If printing speed is increased, then productivity improves, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidprinted object quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic velocity control where the platform speed is continuously adjusted during printing based on real-time feedback. The system can operate at high speeds during non-critical phases and automatically slow down during critical printing operations, achieving both high overall productivity and maintained manufacturing precision through adaptive speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes multiple printing parameters including illumination intensity, exposure time, and platform velocity in coordination with each other. When printing speed is increased, the system compensates by adjusting other parameters (such as increasing illumination intensity or exposure time) to maintain manufacturing precision, resolving the contradiction between productivity and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves print quality and efficiency by dynamically adjusting to varying conditions, ensuring higher quality and reducing waste by optimizing print parameters in real-time.

Implementation Method 1

the membrane rests on a physical tension element such that increasing downward force on the resin tub induces increasing tension on the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Implementation Method 2

projecting an image through the membrane and focused at a polymer interface located within the resin pool using the illumination system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight: Light

Implementation Method 3

utilizes photosensitive polymers (i.e., photopolymers) that cross-link and harden from a liquid resin to a solid polymeric material upon exposure to light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20250269588A1Closed loop print process adjustment based on real time feedback
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 INTREPID AUTOMATION INC
  • US20250269588A1 patent drawing
  • US20250269588A1 patent drawing
  • US20250269588A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, the techniques described herein relate to photoreactive 3D printing systems and methods. The 3D printing system can include: a moveable print platform; a resin tub with a membrane; resin contained within the resin tub; an illumination system; a force sensor; and a print recipe including information for layers in a 3D printed part to be built on the print platform. The photoreactive 3D printing system can be configured to: project an image through the membrane into the volume of resin using the illumination system; move the print platform in a z-direction; measure a force on the print platform using the force sensor; and update a print platform movement in the print recipe during a printing run based on the force on the print platform.