Physician Analytics Interface Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare systems face complexity in acquiring and retaining high-quality physicians while controlling costs, needing effective tools for strategy setting, market analysis, performance measurement, and clinician engagement.

Innovation Solution

A method for displaying physician analytics that combines value and quality metrics to provide insights and referral recommendations, using a system that integrates data from various sources to create interactive interfaces for health system administrators and physicians.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple physician metrics and data sources are integrated to provide comprehensive performance analysis, then the quality and depth of insights improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysician performance measurement accuracyVSAvoidanalytics system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments physician performance data into distinct categories (value metrics, quality metrics, quantity metrics) and processes each separately before integration. This allows comprehensive analysis while managing complexity through modular data handling and presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analytics platform that sits between multiple data sources and the user interface. This intermediary layer consolidates, processes, and standardizes data from various sources, reducing the complexity burden on both data collection and presentation layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If detailed physician performance data and multiple metrics are displayed, then the information completeness improves, but the ease of operation and decision-making decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysician performance information completenessVSAvoidphysician performance analysis ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The interface segments comprehensive physician performance data into organized categories (value, quality, quantity metrics) with clear visual hierarchies. This segmentation allows complete information display while maintaining ease of operation through structured presentation and focused views.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the interface provide different levels of detail and aggregation appropriate to local needs. The system allows users to drill down from summary views to detailed metrics, providing local quality of information matching the specific analytical need at each interface level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system integrates data from multiple sources to create comprehensive physician profiles, then the measurement accuracy improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysician metric accuracyVSAvoiddata integration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs intermediary data processing layers that standardize and harmonize data from multiple sources before integration. This intermediary approach maintains measurement accuracy while reducing the complexity of direct multi-source integration by creating unified data structures and validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11308567B2Physician performance and recommendation interface
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 ADVISORY BOARD CO
  • US11308567B2 patent drawing
  • US11308567B2 patent drawing
  • US11308567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology provides for utilizing and displaying physician analytics. For example, a result metric for a physician is based on a value metric, a quality metric, and/or a quantity metric. The value metric, quality metric, and/or quantity metric may all be received from different sources. The result metric may be displayed on a chart, or the result metric may be utilized for determining referral recommendations for a physician. The result metric may be displayed as a physician indicator on the chart. An insight for the physician may also be determined from the result metric. The insight may be based on the location of the physician indicator on the chart, and the insight may be represented by the color or other visual attribute of the physician indicator. For referral recommendations, the result metric may be used to adjust the rank of a physician in a referral search result.