Physics-Based Generative AI for Single-Iteration Threat Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies are inadequate in rapidly and holistically assessing complex systems, such as aerospace vehicle design and threat analysis, due to limitations in handling nonconvex, discontinuous, and uncertain data, which are common in systems like supply chain management and military operations.

Innovation Solution

A generative artificial intelligence system that executes first-order physics-based engineering equations to autonomously generate designs and assessments, incorporating stochastic variables and expert system design rules, allowing for rapid, secure, and optimized control of complex systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional assessment methods are used for complex systems, then human expertise and judgment are applied, but the process is slow and lacks computational efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment speedVSAvoidtime for holistic assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical human assessment processes with an AI-based computational system that executes physics-based engineering equations. This substitution enables rapid, automated assessment of complex systems while maintaining analytical rigor through first-order physics equations, thereby improving productivity and reducing assessment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI system autonomously performs assessments by executing physics-based equations and generating design evaluations without requiring continuous human intervention. The system serves itself by automatically processing input data, running simulations, and producing comprehensive system assessments, thereby accelerating the assessment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If conventional design assessment approaches are used, then iterative processes are required, but computational efficiency and power consumption are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidprocessor power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining physics-based engineering equations and design rules that guide the AI system's assessment process. These pre-established mathematical models and constraints enable the system to efficiently evaluate designs without requiring extensive iterative computations, thereby improving computational efficiency and reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transitioning from traditional iterative design optimization to a direct physics-based evaluation approach. By using first-order physics equations with predefined parameters and constraints, the AI system can assess designs more efficiently, reducing the computational iterations required and thereby lowering processor power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional design methods are used, then human subjectivity influences design decisions, but consistency and objectivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign assessment consistencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through physics-based equations that provide objective, consistent evaluation criteria for design assessments. The AI system uses these equations to automatically evaluate designs against predefined performance metrics and constraints, eliminating human subjectivity and ensuring consistent, reliable assessments across different design scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by creating a standardized AI-based assessment framework that can evaluate various complex systems (aerospace vehicles, supply chains, military operations) using the same physics-based engineering equations. This multi-functional approach ensures consistent, objective assessments across different domains while managing system complexity through reusable mathematical models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250021062A1Generative artificial intelligence system and method of operating the same
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 INCUCOMM INC
  • US20250021062A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021062A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021062A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A generative artificial intelligence system and method of operating the same to control complex systems. In one embodiment, the method includes receiving performance metrics for a threat system represented as stochastic variables. The method also includes executing first order physics-based engineering equations of the performance metrics with the generative artificial intelligence system on the processor to produce a threat analysis of the threat system to meet the performance metrics in a single iteration improving computational efficiency and reducing power consumption of the processor operating the generative artificial intelligence system.