Physics-Informed Smooth Operator Learning for High-Dimensional Systems Prediction and Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-dimensional dynamical systems pose computational challenges for model-based control policies due to the complexity of their physical models described by partial differential equations (PDEs), and data-driven techniques lack performance guarantees and require large datasets.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for training a smooth operator learning surrogate model that incorporates the smoothness property of dynamics to regularize the training procedure, using an autoencoder architecture with an encoder, a neural ordinary differential equation (ODE) propagator, and a decoder, to predict the future state of the system given an initial state and control sequence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a physical model described by PDEs is used for model-based control, then performance guarantees are achieved, but computational cost becomes too expensive for high-dimensional systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance guaranteesVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified copy (surrogate model) of the complex physical system described by PDEs. This surrogate model uses neural networks to approximate the system dynamics, maintaining performance guarantees while reducing computational complexity to enable real-time control of high-dimensional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (surrogate model with neural network) that bridges the gap between the complex physical model and the control algorithm. This intermediary captures essential system dynamics without requiring full PDE solving, enabling model-based control with reduced computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If data-driven techniques are used to construct control policies, then computational cost is reduced, but large quantities of data are required and performance guarantees are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidperformance guarantees
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters and structure of the surrogate model during training to incorporate physical constraints and smoothness properties. This allows the model to achieve good performance with less data while maintaining reliability through physics-informed regularization terms in the loss function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the surrogate model is trained using operational data while being regularized by physical principles. The training process continuously adjusts model parameters to satisfy both data fidelity and physical consistency, ensuring performance guarantees without requiring large datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If a simplified surrogate model is constructed using operational data, then computational cost is reduced for online control, but large quantities of data are required to ensure sufficient accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidquantity of data
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the training approach by changing the loss function parameters to include physics-informed regularization terms. This allows the surrogate model to learn accurate system dynamics with fewer data points by constraining the solution space to physically plausible behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training the surrogate model offline with available operational data and physical constraints. This preliminary training phase creates a robust model that requires minimal additional data for adaptation, reducing the overall data requirement while maintaining accuracy for online control applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250146695A1Physics-Informed Smooth Operator Learning for High-Dimensional Systems Prediction and Control
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US20250146695A1 patent drawing
  • US20250146695A1 patent drawing
  • US20250146695A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An operator learning model generator is provided for training a smooth operator learning model for predicting airflow dynamics in a room used by a controller connected to a heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system. The operator learning model generator includes an interface circuit configured to receive a training dataset via a network connected to a simulation computer, wherein the training dataset includes solution trajectories of airflow in the room for various times series of control actions given to the HVAC system, a memory configured to store the smooth operator learning model comprising an auto-encoder and a neural ordinary differential equation, the training dataset, and training instructions for the smooth operator learning model, and a processor configured to train the smooth operator learning model stored in the memory, wherein the training instructions comprise a jerk regularization that enforces smoothness of the dynamics predicted by the smooth operator learning model.