Physics Processing Unit Architecture for Real-Time Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional software-based physics engines in computer games are limited in simulating complex, real-time physics interactions due to the general-purpose CPU architecture's inability to handle parallel execution units, data bandwidth, and latency issues, leading to reduced graphics processing and increased CPU time for physics calculations.

Innovation Solution

A hardware-based Physics Processing Unit (PPU) is introduced, separate from the CPU, which includes a PPU Control Engine, Data Movement Engine, and Floating Point Engine, designed to efficiently perform floating-point operations and data communication, utilizing parallel processing and high-speed data buses to handle physics simulation data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional software-based physics engines are used on general-purpose CPU, then the system can handle complex physics calculations, but the CPU architecture's inability to handle parallel execution units and data bandwidth limitations reduce simulation speed and increase processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysics simulation speedVSAvoidCPU architecture limitations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the physics processing function from the general-purpose CPU by introducing a dedicated Physics Processing Unit (PPU). This segmentation allows the PPU to handle physics calculations in parallel with the CPU handling other game logic and graphics rendering, thereby resolving the contradiction between simulation speed and architectural limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a Physics Engine as an intermediary layer between the CPU and the physics simulation requirements. This physics engine can be implemented as specialized hardware or optimized software that mediates the complex parallel execution requirements, translating them into operations that can be efficiently performed by the available processing units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If more CPU time is allocated to physics calculations, then physics simulation accuracy improves, but graphics processing time is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysics simulation accuracyVSAvoidgraphics processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the processing responsibilities between a dedicated PPU for physics calculations and the GPU for graphics rendering, the system can simultaneously maintain high physics simulation accuracy and graphics processing speed without time allocation trade-offs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of processing architecture from a single general-purpose CPU to a specialized parallel architecture with PPU and GPU. This parameter change enables both high-fidelity physics simulation and real-time graphics rendering to occur concurrently at full performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional processors are used for physics simulation, then the system maintains simplicity, but only relatively simple physics-based interactions can be simulated in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysics interaction complexityVSAvoidreal-time simulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Physics Engine as an intermediary that provides access to sophisticated physics simulation capabilities. This intermediary layer allows complex physics interactions to be simulated in real-time through specialized instructions and data structures that bridge the gap between simple processor architecture and complex simulation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical limitation of general-purpose sequential processing with a specialized parallel processing architecture designed specifically for physics simulations. This substitution enables complex physics interactions to be handled in real-time by matching the computational architecture to the simulation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7895411B2Physics processing unit
Publication Date: 2011.02.22 NVIDIA CORP
  • US7895411B2 patent drawing
  • US7895411B2 patent drawing
  • US7895411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the invention sets forth a hardware-based physics processing unit (PPU) having unique architecture designed to efficiently generate physics data. The PPU includes a PPU control engine (PCE), a data movement engine and a floating point engine (FPE). The PCE manages the overall operation of the PPU by allocating memory resources and transmitting graphics processing commands to the FPE and data movement commands to the DME. The FPE includes multiple vector processors that operate in parallel and perform floating point operations on data received from a host unit to generate physics simulation data. The DME facilitates the transmission of data between the host unit and the FPE by performs data movement operations between memories internal and external to the PPU.