Dual Optimization of Pick Routing and Tote Fill Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional order picking systems in e-commerce facilities often lead to inefficiencies as pickers are assigned orders randomly, resulting in some pickers handling large or heavy orders, which increases the number of trips to the order assembly station, thereby delaying the order picking process.

Innovation Solution

The system performs dual optimization of pick lists for each picker by considering both item proximity constraints and tote value constraints, ensuring that each picker minimizes returns to the order assembly station and processes orders efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If orders are assigned randomly to pickers, then order assignment is simple and quick, but some pickers handle large or heavy orders which increases trips to the order assembly station and delays the picking process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder picking speedVSAvoidtime for trips to order assembly station
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization of pick lists before assignment to pickers. By pre-calculating optimal order batches considering item proximity constraints and tote value constraints, the system prepares balanced pick lists that minimize trips to the order assembly station, thereby improving picking speed without causing delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically optimizes pick lists by considering real-time constraints such as item proximity and tote capacity. The optimization process adapts to different order compositions and picker capabilities, creating dynamic batch assignments that reduce unnecessary trips while maintaining simple and quick assignment execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If pick lists are optimized considering item proximity and tote constraints, then picking efficiency improves, but the optimization process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder picking efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process is segmented into distinct constraints: item proximity constraints and tote value constraints. By dividing the optimization problem into these manageable segments, the system can process each constraint separately and combine results, improving picking efficiency while keeping the overall process tractable and not excessively complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If pickers minimize returns to the order assembly station, then processing time is reduced, but tote capacity utilization must be precisely optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidtote capacity optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for order batching by incorporating tote value constraints (weight, volume, size) alongside item proximity constraints. By adjusting these parameters in the optimization process, the system achieves precise tote capacity utilization that minimizes returns to the order assembly station and reduces overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12299632B2Systems and methods for dual optimization of pick walk and tote fill rates for order picking
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US12299632B2 patent drawing
  • US12299632B2 patent drawing
  • US12299632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems and computer-readable media are provided for dual optimization of pick walk and tote fill rates in order picking. Embodiments provide improved order picking speed and quality by optimizing pick routing with consideration of both proximity constraints and tote value constraints. Tote value constraints can include constraints on carrying capacity, volume, size in a particular dimension, or weight capacity.