Order Fulfillment Picker Correlation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computerized systems for order fulfillment face inefficiencies in correlating items with pickers, leading to increased costs, delayed shipments, and reduced customer satisfaction due to complex algorithms that struggle with high-volume operations and urgent order requirements.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that iteratively correlates items with the closest picker based on urgency and job priority, reassigns items as priorities change, and optimizes picker tasking to minimize delays and reduce costs by using a processor and storage medium to manage picker locations and item assignments dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If complex computerized algorithms are used to optimize picker routing and item correlation, then picker tasking efficiency may improve, but computational time increases causing delays in assignment and reducing overall picking operation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicker tasking efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational time for algorithm processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing optimal picker-item correlations in data structures before actual picking operations begin. This allows the complex optimization to be done in advance during low-demand periods, so that when picking operations start, the decisions are already made and can be executed immediately without computational delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm processing is segmented into discrete, manageable steps: first determining urgency levels, then identifying closest pickers, then correlating items with pickers in iterative batches. This segmentation allows the complex optimization to be broken down into smaller operations that can be processed efficiently and completed within acceptable timeframes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If traditional assignment algorithms process all combinations of pickers and items, then optimal routing may be achieved, but processing time grows substantially increasing delays between assignments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidtime for processing combinations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of processing all combinations uniformly, the system applies local quality by focusing computational resources on the most critical decisions first - determining urgency levels and identifying the closest picker for each item. This localized approach processes only the essential information needed for optimal routing rather than all possible combinations, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Speed

If items are correlated with closest picker immediately, then assignment speed increases, but reassignment may be needed when priorities change requiring system flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment speedVSAvoidsystem flexibility for priority changes
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by creating a flexible correlation data structure that can be dynamically updated when priorities change. The algorithm continuously monitors job priorities and can reassign items to different pickers when needed, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining fast initial assignments. The data structure supports both rapid initial correlation and subsequent dynamic reassignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12039589B2Systems and computerized methods for item correlation and prioritization
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 COUPANG CORP
  • US12039589B2 patent drawing
  • US12039589B2 patent drawing
  • US12039589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a computerized method item correlation including: receiving an indication of an order comprising at least one item; determining if the order is urgent based on an amount of time remaining until the items must ship to a customer; determining a location of each of a plurality of pickers; iteratively, for items in the order: identifying a picker closest to the item, the picker having a current job priority; correlating the closest picker and the item in a data structure; re-correlating, in the data structure, at least one item previously correlated with the closest picker to an alternate picker in response to the current job priority not being urgent; sending, to a user device of the closest picker, a location and item identifier associated with the item; and storing, in the data structure, a completion flag in correlation with the item upon receipt of an item-complete message.