Picker Surge Pricing Interface for Budget-Constrained Demand Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online concierge systems face challenges in effectively managing supply and demand disparities among shoppers through surge pricing, balancing cost and encouragement, without exceeding budget constraints.

Innovation Solution

An online concierge system employs a dynamic surge pricing model that forecasts supply and demand, adjusts picker wages with multipliers, and optimizes these adjustments using iterative simulations and machine learning to maintain budget adherence while encouraging participation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If surge pricing is implemented to encourage more shoppers to fulfill orders during high-demand periods, then picker participation increases, but the cost to the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicker participationVSAvoidsurge pricing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic surge pricing multipliers that automatically adjust based on real-time supply and demand conditions. The multiplier for each time period is determined by comparing forecasted supply (available pickers) against forecasted demand (orders requiring fulfillment), creating a flexible pricing mechanism that adapts to changing conditions without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs an iterative simulation process where candidate surge pricing models are tested against historical data and performance metrics. The system continuously refines multipliers by comparing simulated outcomes against actual results, using feedback loops to optimize the balance between encouraging picker participation and controlling system costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If higher wages are offered to increase picker supply during low-demand periods, then supply increases, but budget constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicker supplyVSAvoidwage cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the wage parameter dynamically by applying time-period-specific multipliers to base wages. During low-demand periods, the surge multiplier is reduced or set to zero, while during high-demand periods, the multiplier increases to attract more pickers. This parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize picker supply according to actual demand conditions without consistently exceeding budget constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by forecasting supply and demand metrics in advance for multiple future time periods and pre-calculating optimal surge pricing multipliers before the periods begin. This allows the system to proactively prepare wage adjustments that align with anticipated demand patterns, ensuring budget compliance while maintaining adequate picker supply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If iterative wage simulations are performed to optimize surge pricing multipliers, then budget adherence is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget adherenceVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified copies of the actual system by using historical data to build representative models for simulation. Instead of simulating every possible scenario with full system complexity, the system uses aggregated historical patterns and statistical relationships to create computationally efficient models that capture the essential dynamics of supply, demand, and wage responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the optimization problem by evaluating surge pricing multipliers for each time period independently rather than optimizing all periods simultaneously. This breaks down the complex iterative simulation into manageable discrete time segments, reducing computational complexity while maintaining the ability to achieve budget adherence through cumulative optimization across segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250342413A1User interface for presenting ranked surge pricing opportunities for pickers in an online concierge system
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20250342413A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342413A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342413A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An online concierge system schedules pickers (shoppers) to fulfill orders from users. During periods of peak demand, the system increases compensation to shoppers to encourage more to participate, thereby reducing missed orders. The system determines an optimal multiplier to increase compensation based on predictive models of supply and demand and then applying an optimization algorithm to search different hyperparameters that affect how the models generate the multipliers. The system selects the optimal multipliers for different time periods and locations. The system may further present the multipliers being offered during future time periods and enable users to activate reminder alerts for select periods. The offers may be presented in a ranked list using a model trained to infer likelihoods of the user accepting participation and/or setting a reminder notification.