3D-Guided Picking Robot Trajectory for Dense Container Packing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current picking robots with suction grippers face challenges in achieving high packing density due to pendulum movements, which lead to collisions with container walls or adjacent items, resulting in reduced throughput and lower packing efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A picking robot equipped with a 3D camera and a control system that determines a trajectory allowing the article to gently touch or approach the boundary wall, maintaining a calculated lowering distance to avoid collisions, and using a pivoting end member to absorb and dampen pendulum movements, enabling precise placement without safety gaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If items are placed with a safety distance from container walls or adjacent items, then collision risk is reduced, but packing density decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidpacking density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the item's pendulum motion characteristics before placement, and pre-calculates the optimal placement position that accounts for the expected swing trajectory, allowing the item to be placed closer to walls while still avoiding collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts placement parameters (position, orientation, velocity) based on real-time detection of item properties and pendulum characteristics, optimizing the balance between collision avoidance and packing density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the gripper trajectory is perfectly vertical, then placement precision is improved, but pendulum motion causes collisions with container walls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement precisionVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies a counteracting force or trajectory adjustment before placement to compensate for the expected pendulum swing, making the item approach the target position against its natural swing direction to ensure accurate and safe placement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that detects pendulum motion characteristics and translates them into compensated trajectory commands, mediating between the vertical gripper motion and the item's natural pendulum behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If stabilization waiting time is increased, then oscillation damping is improved, but throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation stabilizationVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the item's own pendulum motion characteristics (detected during the transfer process) to determine the optimal stabilization time, allowing each item to self-regulate its placement timing based on its natural oscillation pattern rather than using a uniform waiting period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for higher packing density and improved throughput by safely placing articles close to container walls and adjacent items, reducing oscillations and maintaining contact pressure to compact the stack.

Implementation Method 1

picking robot with a suction gripper for gripping an article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

the gripper's inherent elasticity inevitably causes the item to swing on the gripper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPendulum: Pendulum

Implementation Method 3

pendulum movements, which lead to collisions with container walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

the gripper's inherent elasticity inevitably causes the item to swing on the gripper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4049806B1Picking robot with optimized trajectory and method for controlling a picking robot
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 IGZ ING FUR LOGISTISCHE INFORMATIONSSYST MBH
  • EP4049806B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4049806B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP4049806B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a picking robot with a suction gripper (18) for gripping an article (16), with at least one 3D camera for detecting a target container (32) and a control (12) for determining a trajectory (24) of the suction gripper (18) for picking up an article (16) from a source container (30) and for placing the article (16) in the target container (32).It is proposed that the control (12) is designed to determine, from the data of the 3D camera (28) using image processing software, a storage location of the article (16) in the target container (32) and at least one boundary wall (20) in the target container (32) and to determine the trajectory (24) such that the article (16) moves vertically downwards in a lowering section (24a), so that the article (16) is horizontally offset from the storage location by a lowering distance (A) in the lowering section (24a), and approaches the boundary wall (20) in a final section (24b) of the trajectory (24) following the lowering section (24a), or that the article (16) touches the boundary wall (20) in a settling section (24c) of the trajectory (24).