P&ID Symbol Detection Using Semi-Supervised Siamese Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer vision methods for symbol detection in piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) are limited by the need for extensive manual data annotation, lack of generalizability across diverse drawing styles, and high costs associated with creating and maintaining multiple machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage semi-supervised symbol detection framework that utilizes self-supervised learning to minimize human annotation by labeling all symbols as a single generic class, leveraging a diverse dataset for training, and applying a Siamese network for symbol differentiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If extensive manual data annotation is used to train machine learning models for symbol detection, then detection accuracy can be improved, but the cost and time required for data preparation increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-supervised learning where the AI model automatically generates its own training data by analyzing unlabeled P&ID sheets and creating synthetic training examples. This eliminates the need for manual annotation of training data, significantly reducing data preparation time while maintaining detection accuracy through automated feature learning and symbol differentiation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates synthetic training data by generating virtual representations of symbols and diagrams through computer-generated imagery (CGI) and automated rendering. These synthetic copies replace the need for manual annotation of real P&ID sheets, providing abundant training data without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machine learning models are created to handle diverse drawing styles, then generalizability improves, but device complexity and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralizability across drawing stylesVSAvoidmodel management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a single universal AI model that is trained to recognize multiple symbol types and handle diverse drawing styles through self-supervised learning. This multi-functional model replaces the need for multiple specialized models, reducing complexity while maintaining the ability to detect symbols across various P&ID styles and domains

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The model adapts to different drawing styles by dynamically adjusting its internal parameters and feature extraction mechanisms during inference. The self-supervised training enables the model to learn invariant features that remain consistent across different styles, allowing one model to handle multiple styles without requiring separate models for each

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260065661A1Semi-supervised symbol detection for piping and instrumentation drawings
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20260065661A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065661A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065661A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An artificial intelligence-based method for interpreting Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) sheets is disclosed. The method includes obtaining a plurality of P&ID sheets in digital format and localizing symbols therein by generating bounding boxes. The localized symbols are labeled as a single generic class to generate a training dataset. A self-supervised learning process trains an artificial intelligence model using the training dataset to identify distinctive symbol features by minimizing the distance between embeddings of similar symbols while maximizing the distance between dissimilar ones. The trained model generates predictive output describing symbols in new P&ID sheets not used in training. The predictive output is then presented for further use.