PID Controller Tuning for I/O Network Delays and Aliasing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In process control systems, PID controllers often underperform due to complex communication networks introducing time delays, noise, and higher-order effects, making optimal tuning challenging, especially in industrial settings with harsh conditions and varying dynamics.

Innovation Solution

A method for designing and tuning PID controllers that approximates the process as a second-order system incorporating time delays and scan rates of I/O network devices, using a lambda tuning method to determine optimal tuning parameters, thereby accounting for higher-order effects and improving control performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If PID controllers are used in complex communication networks with multiple devices, then control coverage and functionality are improved, but time delays and higher-order effects increase causing performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol coverageVSAvoidtime delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates the time delay characteristics from the complex communication network by approximating the higher-order process as a second-order plus time delay model. This separation allows the controller to compensate for time delays explicitly rather than dealing with the full complexity of the network-induced delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the complex higher-order process parameters into simplified second-order parameters (omega_n, zeta, theta) through approximation. This parameter transformation enables the use of simplified tuning methods while accounting for the essential time delay characteristics of the communication network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If traditional PID tuning methods are used without considering I/O network characteristics, then tuning simplicity is maintained, but control performance and stability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning simplicityVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary approximation of the higher-order process as a second-order plus time delay model before applying PID tuning. This preliminary action simplifies the process model in advance, allowing standard tuning methods to be applied effectively while accounting for time delay characteristics, thus maintaining both simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a second-order plus time delay model as an intermediary between the complex communication network and the PID controller. This intermediary model captures the essential time delay effects while providing a simplified representation that works well with traditional PID tuning methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If higher-order process models are used to accurately represent complex communication networks, then model accuracy is improved, but controller design and tuning complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcontroller design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex higher-order process into a simplified second-order model plus explicit time delay component. This segmentation maintains the essential dynamic characteristics and time delay effects while reducing the mathematical complexity, making the controller design and tuning process more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy (second-order plus time delay model) of the complex higher-order process. This copy retains the critical time delay characteristics and dominant dynamics while being mathematically tractable for PID controller design, avoiding the need to work with the full higher-order complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11467543B2Process controller design with process approximation and lambda tuning
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 FISHER ROSEMOUNT SYST INC
  • US11467543B2 patent drawing
  • US11467543B2 patent drawing
  • US11467543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for designing and tuning a PID process controller includes approximating a process as a second order process but in a manner that includes the effects or characteristics introduced by various different devices in the I/O network, and using a lambda tuning method to determine tuning parameters or coefficients for the PID controller. The enhanced controller design and tuning method provides a systematic manner of achieving performance improvement of PID controllers within a process control system and is effective at overcoming challenges arising from signal aliasing, the use of anti-aliasing filtering and the effects of different I/O settings of both traditional and advanced I/O marshalling architectures.