Handling Control Strategy Using KPI Feedback for Piece Goods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handling devices for piece goods struggle to adapt their control strategies to changing boundary conditions, such as variations in piece goods, leading to subjective and time-consuming manual adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that acquires piece good information, transmits it to a data center, determines key performance indicators, and adapts the control strategy based on these indicators, enabling automatic reaction to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual control adjustment is used to adapt handling devices to changing piece goods, then the control strategy can be fine-tuned based on user observations, but the process becomes time-consuming and subjective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of control strategyVSAvoidtime for manual adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The handling device automatically adjusts its own control strategy by processing piece good information through trained machine learning models, eliminating the need for manual intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously adapting to changing boundary conditions based on real-time data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects piece good information from sensors and cameras, processes this data through machine learning models, and uses the results to automatically adjust control parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables automatic adaptation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual control adjustment is used to adapt handling devices to changing piece goods, then the control strategy can be fine-tuned based on user observations, but the process depends on user experience and cannot account for all boundary conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of control strategyVSAvoidobjectivity of control adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated information processing system. Machine learning models process piece good data objectively, substituting human judgment with algorithmic decision-making that consistently evaluates all boundary conditions without subjective bias.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary between piece good characteristics and control strategy adjustment. This intermediary objectively processes all input data including images, dimensions, and physical properties, translating them into optimal control parameters without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If automated control strategy determination is implemented using piece good information and key performance indicators, then the system can automatically adapt to changing boundary conditions, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of control adaptationVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs universal machine learning models that can process multiple types of piece good information (images, dimensions, physical properties) and determine various control parameters (speed, acceleration, force) using the same underlying system architecture. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity despite the comprehensive automation achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250200495A1Computer-implemented method for determining a control strategy for controlling a handling process of at least one handling device for handling piece goods, computer program and handling device for handling piece goods
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 KERBER SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS GESELLSCHAFT MITT BESCHLENKTEL HAFZUNG
  • US20250200495A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200495A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200495A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for determining a control strategy for controlling a handling process of at least one handling device for handling piece goods includes detecting or obtaining at least one piece good information of at least one piece good which has been handled by the handling device, transmitting the at least one piece good information to a data center, determining at least one key performance indicator of the handling process of the handling device based on the at least one piece good information, determining a control strategy for the at least one handling device based on the at least one key performance indicator, a related computer program and a related handling device.