Pierce Nut Groove Geometry for High-Strength Sheet Metal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pierce nuts fail to provide sufficient torque resistance and pull-through resistance when used with high-strength sheet metal, leading to increased punching force requirements, tool damage, and alignment errors, as they require substantial metal deformation and are susceptible to fatigue failure.

Innovation Solution

A pierce nut design featuring an abutment surface with an undercut pilot and a countersunk groove without active undercuts, utilizing an inner and outer groove with specific angles and a ridge to facilitate form-fit interlock, reducing sheet deformation and optimizing the punching process for high-strength sheet metal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If existing pierce nuts are used with high-strength sheet metal, then torque resistance and pull-through resistance are required, but punching force increases and tool damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque resistance and pull-through resistanceVSAvoidpunching force
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the pierce nut, specifically the groove angle (120-180 degrees) and the removal of active undercuts, to reduce sheet metal deformation during punching. This allows achieving required torque and pull-through resistance with lower punching forces, preventing tool damage while maintaining joint strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using active undercuts that push metal outward (conventional approach), the patent inverts the approach by creating a groove without active undercuts that allows metal to flow inward and deform into the groove. This reverse approach reduces the punching force required while maintaining the form-fit interlock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Strength

If existing pierce nuts deform metal sheet substantially, then form-fit interlock is achieved, but fatigue failure risk increases in thin sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform-fit interlockVSAvoidfatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the groove geometry parameters, specifically setting the groove angle to 120-180 degrees and eliminating active undercuts. This creates a more favorable stress distribution that reduces fatigue loading on thin sections while maintaining adequate form-fit interlock through controlled metal flow into the groove.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of metal deformation into a benefit by designing the groove to control deformation in a way that creates a fatigue-resistant joint. The groove geometry guides metal flow to create a interlock that distributes stresses favorably, turning the deformation process into a strength-enhancing feature rather than a fatigue-inducing defect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of manufacture

If greater punching force is applied to high-strength sheet metal, then pierce nut attachment is achieved, but alignment errors between pierce nut and punching die increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepierce nut attachmentVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the groove angle parameter to 120-180 degrees, which reduces the punching force required for attachment. This lower force requirement improves alignment precision by reducing the likelihood of misalignment between the pierce nut and punching die, while still achieving secure attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If active undercuts are used in groove design, then metal sheet deformation is facilitated, but punching force and tool wear increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetal sheet deformationVSAvoidpunching force and tool wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by removing active undercuts from the groove design. Instead of using undercuts to force metal deformation, the groove geometry itself (with its specific angle) facilitates metal flow and deformation into the groove, reducing punching force and tool wear while achieving the same form-fit interlock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances joint strength, reduces punching force, minimizes tool damage, and maintains high torque and pull-through resistance, even with high-strength sheet metal, while allowing for compact geometry and improved alignment.

Implementation Method 1

the sheet is plastically deformed and pressed into the groove and beneath the two undercut portions, thereby to achieve a form-fit interlock between the nut and metal sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2016298B1Pierce nut and use thereof
Publication Date: 2013.08.28 STROMSHOLMEN AB
  • EP2016298B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2016298B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~5
  • EP2016298B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A pierce nut (1) for attachment to a plastically deformable metal sheet (4) has an abutment surface (14) adapted to abut against the metal sheet (4), an undercut pilot (11) protruding relatively to the abutment surface (14), and a countersunk groove (16a, 16b) which is formed in the abutment surface (14) and at least partly surrounds the pilot (11). The groove (16a, 16b) is without active undercuts facing the pilot (11). The groove comprises an inner groove (16a) and an outer groove (16b) and a ridge (17) located therebetween.