Pierce Nut Groove Segmentation for High-Strength Sheet Metal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pierce nuts fail to provide sufficient torque resistance and pull-through resistance when used with high-strength sheet metal, leading to increased punching force requirements, tool damage, and alignment errors.

Innovation Solution

A pierce nut design featuring an abutment surface with an undercut pilot and a countersunk groove without active undercuts, optimized with specific angles and geometries to reduce sheet deformation and enhance form-fit interlock, along with anti-rotation means for improved torque resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If existing pierce nut designs are used with high-strength sheet metal, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but torque resistance and pull-through resistance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque resistance and pull-through resistanceVSAvoidnut structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grooves in the pierce nut are divided into multiple segments (first groove, second groove, third groove) with different orientations and functions. The first groove has an inclined surface for initial deformation, the second groove has a vertical surface for form-fit interlock, and the third groove provides additional locking. This segmentation allows the nut to achieve high strength through coordinated action of multiple simplified groove structures rather than a single complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the grooves have different local geometries optimized for specific functions. The inclined surfaces in the first groove facilitate sheet metal deformation, while the vertical surfaces in the second and third grooves provide form-fit interlock. This local quality differentiation enables each groove segment to perform its specific function efficiently, achieving high overall strength without requiring the entire structure to be complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If existing pierce nut designs are used with high-strength sheet metal, then the manufacturing process is simple, but punching force requirements increase and tool damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepunching forceVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The first groove with its inclined surface performs preliminary deformation of the sheet metal during the punching process. By gradually deforming the metal along the inclined surface before final insertion, the required punching force is reduced compared to direct insertion. This preliminary action prepares the metal for easier insertion into the subsequent grooves, lowering the overall punching force requirement and reducing tool damage risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If existing pierce nut designs are used with high-strength sheet metal, then the design is straightforward, but alignment errors between pierce nut and punching die increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The angles and geometries of the groove surfaces are specifically optimized parameters. The inclined surfaces are designed with specific angles that facilitate controlled deformation, while the vertical surfaces provide precise form-fit interlock. These parameter optimizations improve alignment precision by ensuring the sheet metal deforms and locks in the correct position, reducing alignment errors between the pierce nut and punching die without requiring complex alignment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If existing pierce nut designs are used with high-strength sheet metal, then the structure is simple, but the joint strength and resistance to pull-through forces are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidgroove structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into multiple grooves with different functions: the first groove for initial deformation, the second groove for primary form-fit interlock, and the third groove for additional locking. This segmentation distributes the load-bearing function across multiple simpler structures rather than requiring a single complex locking mechanism, achieving high joint strength through coordinated action of multiple groove segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each groove segment has locally optimized geometry for its specific function. The inclined surfaces in the first groove facilitate deformation, while the vertical surfaces in the second and third grooves provide form-fit interlock. This local quality differentiation enables efficient load distribution across the joint, achieving high overall joint strength without requiring the entire groove structure to be uniformly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves increased joint strength and resistance to pull-through forces while reducing punching force requirements and minimizing tool damage, maintaining high torque resistance and pull-through resistance even with high-strength sheet metal.

Implementation Method 1

the sheet is plastically deformed and pressed into the groove and beneath the two undercut portions, thereby to achieve a form-fit interlock between the nut and metal sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

Pierce nuts should be attached to the metal sheet in such manner that they resist both pull-through forces and torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8931990B2Pierce nut and use thereof
Publication Date: 2015.01.13 STROMSHOLMEN AB
  • US8931990B2 patent drawing
  • US8931990B2 patent drawing
  • US8931990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pierce nut (1) for attachment to a plastically deformable metal sheet (4) has an abutment surface (14) adapted to abut against the metal sheet (4), an undercut pilot (11) protruding relatively to the abutment surface (14), and a countersunk groove (16a, 16b) which is formed in the abutment surface (14) and at least partly surrounds the pilot (11). The groove (16a, 16b) is without active undercuts facing the pilot (11). The groove comprises an inner groove (16a) and an outer groove (16b) and a ridge (17) located therebetween.