Piercing Cap Barb Mechanism for Caulking Chub Leakage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for opening chubs used in caulking guns often result in leakage and require labor-intensive cleaning, as they involve cutting the chub's fastener or piercing it with a knife.

Innovation Solution

A piercing cap with downwardly depending barbs and support webs that pierce the end of the chub when inserted into a sleeve, allowing for unrestricted flow of material while maintaining structural rigidity and directing the chub material away from the flow path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the chub is opened by cutting the fastener or piercing with a knife, then the chub can be opened for use, but leakage occurs and cleaning labor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of openingVSAvoidleakage and cleaning requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cap performs the opening function automatically through its barb structure that pierces the chub end when inserted into the sleeve, eliminating the need for external cutting tools or manual fastener removal. The piercing action is built into the cap's mechanical structure, allowing it to serve both as a closure and an opening mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The barb structure acts as an intermediary element between the cap and the chub. It transfers the mechanical force of insertion into a controlled piercing action that opens the chub end without causing uncontrolled leakage. The barb's geometry and positioning mediate the interaction to ensure clean piercing and material flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional piercing methods are used, then the chub can be opened, but material flow becomes obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of openingVSAvoidmaterial flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The opening function is segmented into multiple barbs distributed around the bore, each contributing to a controlled piercing action. This segmentation allows the piercing to occur in a distributed manner that prevents material accumulation and maintains smooth flow through the bore.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barb structure extends into the third dimension (radially outward from the bore axis) to create a controlled piercing geometry. This dimensional extension allows the barbs to engage with the chub end surface and direct material flow in a controlled manner, preventing obstruction while maintaining opening functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If the chub is pierced with a knife, then the end can be opened, but the knife requires cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of openingVSAvoidcleaning requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cap's barb structure is designed to perform the piercing function without requiring separate cleaning operations. The barb geometry and support web structure are configured to facilitate clean piercing and allow for easy removal of any residual material, eliminating the need for knife cleaning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The cap with its barb structure is designed as a disposable component that performs the piercing function and is then discarded with the spent chub. This eliminates the need for cleaning and maintenance of reusable piercing tools like knives, reducing both labor requirements and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Strength

If a rigid structure is used in the cap, then structural rigidity is maintained, but the chub material may obstruct the flow path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidmaterial flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cap structure exhibits local quality variations where the support webs provide rigidity in specific locations to maintain structural integrity, while the barb regions are configured to facilitate material flow. The support webs are positioned to reinforce the barb structures without creating obstructions in the flow path, allowing localized optimization of both rigidity and flow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250170607A1Piercing Cap For a Chub
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 INGERSOLL PROD
  • US20250170607A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170607A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170607A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cap for use with a sleeve that receives a chub having material to be expelled through the cap. The cap has a base with a lower face with a downwardly depending skirt for receiving in or about an end of the sleeve. The base and the skirt define a cap body having an open interior. A bore extends through the base. One or more downwardly depending barbs are positioned on the lower face and about the bore. The barbs pierce the end of the chub when the skirt is received in or about an end of the sleeve, the chub is received within a longitudinal passageway through the sleeve, and the chub is advanced toward the cap and against the barbs. The barbs encourage movement of a portion of the end surface of the chub away from the bore as the chub is forced against the barbs.