Piezoelectric Actuator Drive Circuit with Dynamic Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing self-oscillating piezoelectric actuator drive circuits face a trade-off between stable oscillation at the primary resonant frequency and increased oscillation amount, where reducing the sense resistor value enhances resonant current but increases the likelihood of oscillation at higher-order frequencies, compromising desired frequency stability.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a switching device that alters the resistance values of the sense resistor and feedback resistors between startup and operating states, using a combination of inverters and a counter to manage frequency characteristics, ensuring primary resonant frequency oscillation while minimizing higher-order resonant frequency effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the sense resistor value is reduced to increase resonant current, then the oscillation amount increases, but the loop gain at primary resonant frequency decreases causing oscillation to occur at higher-order frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation amountVSAvoidfrequency stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the feedback resistor values changeable between startup and operating states. During startup, a first feedback resistor with higher resistance is used to ensure stable primary resonant frequency oscillation. During operation, a second feedback resistor with lower resistance is used to increase oscillation amount. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between frequency stability and oscillation amount.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the resistance parameter of the feedback resistor between two discrete values depending on the operational state. The first feedback resistor has a first resistance value optimized for startup stability, while the second feedback resistor has a second resistance value optimized for operating oscillation strength. This parameter change approach allows the system to achieve both frequency stability and increased oscillation amount at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If the sense resistor value is reduced to increase resonant current, then the oscillation intensity increases, but the effect of higher-order resonant frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonant currentVSAvoidhigher-order resonant frequency effect
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the feedback resistor value based on the operational state. During startup, the first feedback resistor with higher resistance suppresses higher-order resonant frequency effects while establishing primary resonant oscillation. During operation, the second feedback resistor with lower resistance allows increased resonant current while maintaining frequency stability through the established oscillation pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by establishing stable primary resonant frequency oscillation during the startup phase using the first feedback resistor before transitioning to the operation phase. This preliminary establishment of correct oscillation frequency prevents the system from locking into higher-order resonant frequencies even when the sense resistor value is reduced for increased power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach eliminates the trade-off between stable primary resonant frequency oscillation and increased oscillation amount, maintaining predominant primary resonant current and reducing integration costs by adding a minimal number of circuits.

Implementation Method 1

An oscillating body using a piezoelectric actuator can realize lower power consumption and smaller size

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

an integrating circuit that integrates a signal obtained in which a negative feedback signal is subtracted from a positive feedback signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntegration:

Implementation Method 3

a first inverter that inverts an output signal of the integrating circuit; a second inverter that inverts an output signal of the first inverter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal inversion:

Data Source

PatentUS10938325B2Piezoelectric actuator drive circuit
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 NEW JAPAN RADIO CORP
  • US10938325B2 patent drawing
  • US10938325B2 patent drawing
  • US10938325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-oscillating piezoelectric actuator drive circuit includes a integrating circuit; an inverter (INV1), inverters (INV2 and INV3) inverting an output signal of the inverter (INV1), sense resistors (Rs1 and Rs2) connected to output sides of the inverters (INV2 and INV3), a positive feedback resistor (Rfb2) feeding back an output signal of the inverters (INV2 and INV3) to the integrating circuit; and a negative feedback resistor (Rfb1) feeding back a voltage generated from the sense resistors (Rs1 and Rs2, Rs1<Rs2 in terms of a resistance value) to the integrating circuit. In a startup state, the sense resistor (Rs2) and the inverter (INV3) are selected, and in an operating state after the startup state, the sense resistor (Rs1) and the inverter (INV2) are selected.