Piezoelectric Inkjet Nozzle Detection via Counter-Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In liquid ejecting apparatuses, such as ink jet type recording apparatuses, detection accuracy of ejection abnormality is compromised due to pressure loss and reduced amplitude of residual vibration caused by bending of partition walls between high-density pressure chambers, leading to insufficient detection signals.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that simultaneously drive the piezoelectric elements corresponding to the nozzle to be inspected and its adjacent nozzle, using a driving waveform to generate a fluctuation in pressure, while switching between connection and disconnection states to prevent partition wall bending and maintain sufficient pressure, thereby enhancing detection accuracy by obtaining a counter electromotive force signal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a piezoelectric element corresponding to a nozzle to be inspected is driven independently, then ejection abnormality inspection can be performed, but the partition wall bends toward the adjacent pressure chamber causing pressure loss and reduced detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary anti-action by driving the adjacent nozzle's piezoelectric element simultaneously with the inspection nozzle's piezoelectric element. This creates a counteracting pressure effect that prevents the partition wall from bending toward the adjacent pressure chamber, thereby eliminating the pressure loss that would otherwise occur during independent inspection driving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Productivity

If nozzles are disposed in high density, then productivity is improved, but the partition wall becomes very thin causing bending and reduced detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection efficiencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By simultaneously driving the adjacent nozzle's piezoelectric element, the invention creates a counteracting pressure effect that compensates for the structural weakness of thin partition walls in high-density nozzle configurations, preventing wall bending and maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary action by pre-driving the adjacent nozzle's piezoelectric element before or simultaneously with the inspection nozzle's piezoelectric element. This preliminary action creates the necessary counterpressure to prevent partition wall bending before the inspection measurement is taken, ensuring accurate detection despite the thin partition wall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the partition wall bends due to pressure fluctuation, then the amplitude of residual vibration is reduced, but the detection signal amplitude becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection signal amplitude
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The simultaneous driving of the adjacent nozzle's piezoelectric element creates a counteracting pressure effect that prevents partition wall bending. This maintains the structural integrity of the pressure chamber, preserving the amplitude of residual vibration and ensuring sufficient detection signal amplitude for reliable ejection abnormality inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves detection accuracy by maintaining a sufficient amplitude of detection signals and preventing pressure loss, allowing for reliable ejection abnormality inspection without crosstalk between adjacent nozzles.

Implementation Method 1

a piezoelectric element for deforming the operation unit (vibration plate) and ejecting the liquid from the nozzle in association with the driving of the piezoelectric element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

inspects ejection abnormality on the basis of a counter electromotive force of the first piezoelectric element based on the vibration of the operation unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConverse piezoelectric effect: Converse Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8991957B2Liquid ejecting apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8991957B2 patent drawing
  • US8991957B2 patent drawing
  • US8991957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting apparatus includes a first piezoelectric element, a first nozzle that ejects a liquid in association with the driving of the first piezoelectric element, a second piezoelectric element, a second nozzle that ejects a liquid in association with the driving of the second piezoelectric element, a driving signal generation unit that generates a driving signal for driving a plurality of piezoelectric elements, and a residual vibration detection unit that detects residual vibration generated by the driving of the piezoelectric element. The first nozzle is adjacent to the second nozzle.