Piezoelectric Fuze System for Self-Powered Target Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-mode fuze systems for warheads rely on external power sources, which are bulky and degrade over time, and are limited to two operational modes, restricting their effectiveness in target identification and classification.

Innovation Solution

A multi-mode fuze system utilizing a piezoelectric sensor to generate both electrical energy and output signals for target classification, allowing for selection of at least three operational modes based on deceleration rate, with energy self-sufficiency and advanced mode selection capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external power sources (batteries) are used to drive the fuze and electronics, then the system can operate reliably, but the system becomes bulky and the power source degrades over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuze operation reliabilityVSAvoidfuze assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the external battery power source from the fuze assembly. Instead, it uses the piezoelectric impact sensor to generate electrical energy locally during target impact, thereby removing the bulky and degrading battery while maintaining operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The piezoelectric impact sensor serves dual functions: it detects target hardness and simultaneously generates the electrical energy needed to power the electronics and detonator. This self-service approach eliminates the need for separate power sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If the fuze is limited to two operational modes, then the system remains simple, but the versatility in combating different targets is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuze system complexityVSAvoidtarget classification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements dynamic mode selection with at least three operational modes (surface detonation, deep penetration, and delayed detonation) based on real-time target hardness classification. The system dynamically adjusts its operation according to the detected target properties rather than being fixed to predetermined modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The fuze system is designed to handle multiple target types and combat scenarios through its multi-mode capability. It can effectively combat soft targets, hard targets, and intermediate targets by selecting appropriate detonation modes, making it a universal solution for various threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If piezoelectric sensors are used for target identification, then target classification is enabled, but the system becomes dependent on external power sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget hardness detection accuracyVSAvoidelectrical energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The piezoelectric impact sensor generates its own electrical energy from the mechanical impact with the target. This self-generated energy powers both the signal processing electronics and the detonator, eliminating the need for external power sources while maintaining precise target hardness detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the sensing function and power generation function into a single piezoelectric impact sensor. This integration allows the sensor to simultaneously detect target hardness and provide the electrical energy needed for system operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable, instantaneous or delayed warhead detonation with improved target classification and mode selection, eliminating the need for external power sources and expanding operational modes beyond two, enhancing the warhead's combat effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

A multi-mode fuze system utilizing a piezoelectric sensor to generate both electrical energy and output signals for target classification

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2758746B1Dynamic ignition and ignition delay multi-mode fuze system
Publication Date: 2017.08.16 SAAB AB
  • EP2758746B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2758746B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2758746B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a multi-mode fuze system 1 for use in a warhead for combating a target, said multi-mode fuze system 1 comprise at least one target sensor 2 electrically connected to a signal processing block 4 and an I/O-block 5, where said I/O-block 5 is possible to set by the operator of the warhead, where said target sensor 2 is adapted to generate an electrical output in response to the rate of deceleration of the warhead and where said multi-mode fuze system 1 is adapted to discriminate the hardness of the target based upon the electrical output of said target sensor 2 and to select the mode of operation depending upon the said target discrimination, where the multi-mode fuze system 1 is adapted to discriminate at least one type of target depending upon said target sensors 2 electrical output and that the multi-mode fuze system 1 selects one of at least three modes of operation of the warhead. The invention also relates to a method for classifying the target hardness and selection of the operational mode of a warhead.