Piezoelectric Mirror Arrangement for Lithography Wavefront Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithography exposure systems face challenges in maintaining precise optical properties over time due to factors like mirror surface deviations, aging, and environmental influences, which affect the quality of imaging and the accuracy of structure positioning, especially at high numerical apertures and short wavelengths.

Innovation Solution

A mirror arrangement with multiple adjacently arranged mirror elements, each featuring a multilayer structure including a piezoelectric layer and electrode arrangement, allowing for independent control of layer thickness and reflection properties to correct wavefront errors and maintain optical quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the image-side numerical aperture is enlarged to increase resolution capability, then the resolution capability is improved, but the depth of focus range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution capabilityVSAvoiddepth of focus range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic focus adjustment by making the focus plane position variable through a manipulator system. The focus plane can be moved axially relative to the projection objective to maintain the desired depth of focus range while operating at high numerical apertures. This dynamic adjustment compensates for the reduced depth of focus caused by enlarged NA.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If shorter wavelengths are used to increase resolution capability, then the resolution capability is improved, but the range of depth of focus is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution capabilityVSAvoiddepth of focus range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The manipulator system enables dynamic adjustment of the focus plane position, allowing the system to compensate for the reduced depth of focus that occurs when using shorter wavelengths. By making the focus plane position variable, the system maintains adequate depth of focus range even when operating at wavelengths that provide higher resolution capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If mirror surface shape deviates from specified shape, then manufacturing is simplified, but wavefront quality and imaging precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemirror surface fabricationVSAvoidwavefront quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual mirror surface shape is measured and compared to the specified shape. The measured deviations are used to generate correction signals that drive manipulators to adjust the mirror surface, thereby compensating for manufacturing errors and maintaining high wavefront quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction by automatically measuring its own mirror surface deviations and adjusting the mirror positions to compensate for these deviations. This self-service capability allows the system to maintain high imaging precision without requiring extremely tight manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple exposure steps are used to generate fine structures, then finer structures can be produced, but lateral image positioning accuracy requirements are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure finenessVSAvoidlateral image positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from measured mirror surface shapes and wavefront errors to adjust mirror positions, ensuring high lateral image positioning accuracy. This feedback mechanism compensates for positioning errors that would otherwise accumulate across multiple exposure steps, enabling the production of fine structures with the required precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables improved wavefront correction and maintains precise optical properties, reducing aberrations and ensuring high superimposition accuracy across the mirror surface, even under changing conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Each multilayer arrangement includes a piezoelectric layer having a layer thickness which can be controlled by an electric field generated by an associated electrode arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10684466B2Mirror arrangement for lithography exposure apparatus and optical system comprising mirror arrangement
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US10684466B2 patent drawing
  • US10684466B2 patent drawing
  • US10684466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Mirror elements (2a, 2b) include a substrate (4a, 4b) and a multilayer arrangement (5a, 5b). The multilayer arrangement includes a reflective layer system (6a, 6b) having a radiation entrance surface (7a, 7b) and a piezoelectric layer (8a, 8b) arranged between the radiation entrance surface and the substrate. Each mirror element includes an electrode arrangement (9a, 9b, 9c) associated with the piezoelectric layer. A layer thickness (tp) of the piezoelectric layer is controlled by the electric field generated. An interconnection arrangement (10) electrically interconnects adjacent electrodes of adjacent electrode arrangements. According to one formulation, the interconnection arrangement generates an electric field in a gap region (11) between the adjacent electrodes. According to another, an electric resistance (Ri) of the interconnection arrangement in the gap region is greater than an electric resistance (Rw) of the adjacent electrodes and less than an electric resistance (Rl) of the piezoelectric layers of adjacent electrode arrangements.