Pilot Action Capacity Evaluation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is no existing means to precisely evaluate the evolution of an aircraft pilot's action capacities during flight, which is crucial for determining when assistance or replacement is needed.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a database of health and physiological parameter probability curves, measurement modules, computation modules, and a transmission module to assess and communicate the pilot's action capacity levels based on physiological parameter measurements and confidence intervals, using Bayesian classifiers and expert curves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If no evaluation system is implemented, then the system remains simple, but the measurement precision of pilot action capacities cannot be ascertained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precision of pilot action capacitiesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is divided into distinct functional modules: measurement modules for acquiring physiological data, computation modules for processing measurements and calculating conditional probabilities, memory modules for storing expert curves and measurement data, and transmission modules for communicating results. This segmentation allows each module to perform its specific function with high precision while keeping the overall system architecture manageable and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces computation modules as intermediaries that bridge the gap between raw measurement data and actionable evaluation results. These computation modules process measurements by comparing them against stored expert curves and calculating conditional probabilities, thereby transforming complex physiological data into precise action capacity assessments without requiring direct complex interactions between measurement and evaluation components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If existing simple monitoring methods are used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of action capacity evaluation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of action capacity evaluationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring physiological parameters and comparing them against expert curves to calculate conditional probabilities of pilot states. This feedback loop allows the system to dynamically adjust evaluations based on real-time measurements, thereby improving reliability. The transmission module also provides feedback by communicating evaluation results to relevant systems, enabling timely responses to changes in pilot action capacities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing expert curves that represent known relationships between physiological parameters and pilot states in the memory module. These expert curves are prepared in advance based on expert knowledge and empirical data, allowing the computation modules to quickly and reliably evaluate pilot action capacities by comparing real-time measurements against these pre-established reference curves, thereby enhancing evaluation reliability without requiring complex real-time analysis of all possible scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10172566B2System and method for evaluating action capacities of an individual
Publication Date: 2019.01.08 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US10172566B2 patent drawing
  • US10172566B2 patent drawing
  • US10172566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for evaluating the action capacities of an individual comprising at least one measurement module, each measurement module being configured to produce at least one measurement point of a physiological parameter of the individual; a computation module configured to determine at least one set of measurement points representative of a distribution law for the measurement point or points, termed measured set; a computation module configured to compute at least one conditional probability of having one or more states of health; a third computation module configured to compute an average of the computed conditional probability or probabilities; a fourth computation module configured to determine at least one level of action capacity of the individual; a transmission module configured to transmit a signal representative of the level or levels of action capacity of the individual to a user device.