Pilot Injector Fuel Shifting in Axial Staged Combustor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lean-staged liquid-fuelled aero-engine combustors in gas turbine engines are prone to combustion instabilities due to heat release concentration and weak flame holding, particularly in radial-staged designs where all fuel is injected at the front-end, leading to dilution by main stage air affecting pilot stage fuel-air ratios.

Innovation Solution

A pilot fuel injector with a swirler and nozzle featuring dual sub-circuits for fuel injection, where the first sub-circuit injects fuel upstream with apertures oriented counter to the swirler direction and the second sub-circuit injects downstream with apertures oriented co-swirl with the swirler direction, controlled by a fuel injection controller to optimize flame configuration and stabilize combustion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If all fuel is injected at the front-end of the combustor into different radial zones (radial staging), then the combustor can provide lean-staged combustion with low emissions, but combustion instabilities occur due to heat release concentration and weak flame holding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions (NOx and particulate matter)VSAvoidcombustion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection system is segmented into multiple axial stages (front-end radial staging and rear-end axial staging) with different injection patterns. The front-end injectors perform radial staging for low emissions, while rear-end injectors provide axial staging for combustion stability, combining the benefits of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different injection strategies are applied to different spatial zones within the combustor. Front-end injectors use radial staging optimized for emission control, while rear-end injectors use axial staging optimized for flame holding and stability, creating locally optimized combustion zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If main stage air is introduced to dilute the pilot stage fuel-air ratio in radial-staged lean combustors, then emissions are reduced, but flame holding capability weakens leading to combustion instabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidflame holding capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion process is segmented into pilot stage and main stage with spatially separated fuel injection zones. The pilot stage operates with a richer mixture for reliable flame holding, while the main stage provides dilution for emission control, avoiding the conflict between dilution and flame holding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pilot flame acts as an intermediary between the main stage air and the combustion process. It provides a stable ignition source that can sustain combustion even when main stage air dilutes the overall fuel-air ratio, enabling both low emissions and reliable flame holding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If heat release is concentrated in the front of the combustor (radial staging), then emissions are reduced, but combustion instabilities are triggered

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidcombustion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Heat release is segmented axially into front-end and rear-end zones with different injection patterns. The front-end radial staging provides low emissions, while the rear-end axial staging distributes heat release to stabilize combustion, preventing instabilities from concentrated heat release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual injection strategy enhances fuel-air mixing for low NOx and particulate emissions, mitigates combustion instabilities, and optimizes flame configuration within the combustion chamber, improving engine performance across power operations.

Implementation Method 1

The nozzle includes a primary fuel circuit configured to atomize fuel dispensed therethrough

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization:

Implementation Method 2

The swirler dispenses air in a swirler direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirling flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 3

combustion chamber of the combustor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP3301373B1Pilot injector fuel shifting in an axial staged combustor for a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 UNITED TECH CORP
  • EP3301373B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3301373B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3301373B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A pilot fuel injector (338) for a combustor of a gas turbine engine includes a swirler (346) having an exit (346a) into a combustion chamber of the combustor and a nozzle (348) located within the swirler (346). The nozzle (348) includes a primary fuel circuit (360) configured to atomize fuel dispensed therethrough and a secondary fuel circuit (362) having a first sub-circuit (364) having at least one injection aperture a first injection depth (D1) from the exit of the swirler and a second sub-circuit (366) having at least one second injection aperture located at a second injection depth (D2) from the exit (346a) of the swirler (346), wherein the first injection depth (D1) is greater than the second injection depth (D2).