AI Pilot Fatigue Assessment Using Schedule and Survey Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current self-assessment processes for pilot fatigue are rudimentary and do not adequately address the unique needs of pilots, often relying on single-question assessments, which can lead to decreased performance and increased accident risk due to inadequate fatigue management.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing an AI control unit that integrates machine learning models to analyze pilot schedules and survey data, providing a tailored readiness assessment through a user interface, including features like correlation analysis, dimensionality reduction, and a voting classifier model to predict pilot readiness levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional self-assessment processes are used for pilot fatigue, then the assessment process is simple and quick, but the accuracy and reliability of fatigue detection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue detection accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fatigue assessment into multiple independent components: schedule analysis module, survey data collection module, physiological data collection module, and machine learning prediction module. Each module handles a specific aspect of data collection or processing, allowing the complex assessment task to be divided into manageable segments that can be developed and validated independently while improving overall detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediary components between raw data (schedules, surveys, physiological measurements) and fatigue assessment results. These ML models process and integrate multiple data sources, transforming diverse inputs into reliable readiness predictions without requiring direct complex rule-based logic in the assessment system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple data sources are integrated for comprehensive pilot assessment, then the reliability of readiness assessment is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadiness assessment reliabilityVSAvoiddata integration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal machine learning framework that can process multiple types of data (schedules, survey responses, physiological measurements) through a single integrated model architecture. This multi-functional approach allows the same core system to handle diverse data sources, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity through separate specialized systems for each data type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in machine learning models to adapt to different data conditions and pilot states. By adjusting model parameters based on the specific combination of available data sources, the system optimizes assessment reliability for varying operational contexts without requiring fundamentally different system architectures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250223051A1Systems and methods for assessing fatigue of pilot of aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250223051A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223051A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223051A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method include an artificial intelligence (AI) control unit configured to: receive a schedule for a pilot of an aircraft, receive survey answer data from the pilot, use one or more machine learning models to analyze the schedule and the survey answer data, and assess a readiness level of the pilot based on the schedule and the survey answer data. The aircraft is operated in accordance with the readiness level as assessed by the AI control unit.