Pilot Valve Actuator With Differential Gearing for Fail-Safe Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote adjustment systems for gas regulators in gas distribution networks face challenges in maintaining accuracy and system life due to the addition of pneumatic chambers, require significant energy storage for fail-safe mechanisms, and struggle to meet intrinsically safe classifications, especially in explosive environments.

Innovation Solution

The use of a differential gear arrangement that allows either electric motor to drive the actuator shaft, eliminating the need for energy storage and high-energy components, and providing a fail-to-known position feature without latching or braking mechanisms, ensuring safe and reliable operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a pneumatic bias chamber is added to enable remote adjustment, then remote adjustment capability is improved, but regulator performance deteriorates and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote adjustment capabilityVSAvoidregulator performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical fixed stop system with an electric motor-driven actuator system. The actuator uses a differential gear mechanism driven by electric motors to position the pilot valve stop, eliminating the need for pneumatic bias chambers and associated solenoid valves. This substitution maintains remote adjustment capability while preserving regulator performance and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If energy storage spring is used for fail-to-known position feature, then fail-safe capability is improved, but device complexity and energy requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefail-to-known position capabilityVSAvoidlocking device and spring mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical spring-based fail-safe mechanisms with an electric motor-based system. The actuator incorporates a differential gear mechanism where one motor serves as the primary drive and the other motor provides fail-safe functionality. This eliminates the need for energy storage springs, locking devices, and complex mechanical fail-safe mechanisms while maintaining the fail-to-known position capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If high energy components are used for fail-safe mechanism, then reliability is improved, but intrinsically safe classification becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefail-safe mechanismVSAvoidignition risk in explosive environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces high-energy mechanical components with low-energy electric motor components. The differential gear mechanism uses two electric motors where the second motor can drive the mechanism to a known position if the first motor fails. Electric motors inherently store less energy than springs or electromagnetic locking devices, making the system more suitable for intrinsically safe classification in explosive environments while maintaining fail-safe functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If latching or braking arrangement is used to control motor drive, then control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidlatching or braking arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces latching or braking arrangements with a differential gear mechanism controlled by two electric motors. The control system uses software logic to determine which motor should be active based on the desired valve position and system state. This eliminates the need for mechanical latching or braking components while maintaining precise control through electronic control of motor activation and torque management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables remote and accurate adjustment of gas regulator set points while ensuring system longevity and compliance with safety standards, including intrinsically safe classifications, by allowing either motor to operate the actuator without additional safety mechanisms, thus preventing unwanted energy release or ignition risks.

Implementation Method 1

a differential gear arrangement (3) configured to drive the actuator drive shaft (18) when one of the drive electric motor (1) or the emergency electric motor (5) is powered to provide a drive torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential gear mechanism: Gear

Data Source

PatentEP3516263B1Actuator for a regulator pilot valve
Publication Date: 2021.04.07 UTONOMY LTD
  • EP3516263B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2a
  • EP3516263B1 patent drawingFigure 2b~2c
  • EP3516263B1 patent drawingFigure 2d~2e

AI summary

An actuator for adjusting a pilot valve in a gas supply regulator, the actuator comprising a drive electric motor configured to provide rotational movement to a first drive shaft, an emergency electric motor configured to provide rotational movement to a second drive shaft, a differential gear arrangement coupled to the first drive shaft and coupled to the second drive shaft and configured to generate rotational movement of an actuator drive shaft from the rotational movement provided by one of the first drive shaft and the second drive shaft, and a rotary to linear device coupled to the actuator drive shaft and configured to convert rotational movement of the actuator drive shaft into a linear movement for adjusting the pressure valve. The differential gear arrangement is configured to drive the actuator drive shaft when one of the drive electric motor or the emergency electric motor is powered to provide a drive torque to one of the first drive shaft or the second drive shaft and the other of the drive electric motor and the emergency electric motor unpowered. By configuring a back drive torque of each of the drive electric motor and the emergency electric motor with respect to a resistive torque of the actuator drive shaft and the drive torques provided by the drive electric motor and the emergency electric motor, the drive electric motor and the emergency electric motor can be permanently connected to the actuator drive shaft through the differential gear arrangement, which obviates a requirement for a latching or braking arrangement.