Network Device PIM Cancellation Using Segmented Nonlinear Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PIM cancellation techniques are complex and require high processing power, especially when dealing with multiple transmitters and receivers, due to the need for individual polynomial modeling of nonlinear channel effects in MIMO systems.

Innovation Solution

A method that separates the PIM model into a linear forward path model, a common nonlinear PIM source model, and a linear reflective path model for each receiver, reducing complexity by reusing the nonlinear model across all receiver branches and combining transmitter signals before nonlinear modeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual polynomial modeling is used for each Tx-Rx combination to cancel PIM signals, then the accuracy of PIM cancellation is improved, but the computational complexity and processing power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePIM cancellation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the PIM cancellation process into two distinct phases: an offline training phase where polynomial coefficients are determined using pilot signals, and an online cancellation phase where the pre-determined coefficients are applied to cancel PIM in actual data signals. This segmentation allows complex polynomial modeling to be performed only when necessary, reducing real-time computational complexity while maintaining cancellation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by determining the polynomial coefficients during a training phase before actual data transmission. The coefficients are calculated in advance using known pilot signals and stored for reuse. During data transmission, only simple polynomial evaluation and subtraction are needed, avoiding the need to recompute complex polynomial models for each data symbol, thus significantly reducing processing power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If high-order polynomial terms are included in the PIM model to accurately represent nonlinear effects, then the modeling precision is improved, but the number of computations and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenonlinear modeling accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using a truncated polynomial model that includes only the necessary terms up to a certain order (e.g., third-order terms) rather than modeling all possible polynomial interactions. The patent demonstrates that including terms up to third order provides sufficient accuracy for PIM cancellation in practical scenarios, avoiding the computational burden of higher-order terms while maintaining adequate cancellation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of polynomial order dynamically by adapting the model complexity based on signal conditions. The system can adjust the maximum polynomial order used in cancellation based on the observed PIM signal characteristics and channel conditions, using lower-order models when sufficient and higher-order models only when necessary, thus optimizing the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the PIM cancellation model is updated frequently to adapt to changing channel conditions, then the adaptability of the system is improved, but the processing power and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel adaptation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by updating the polynomial coefficients at specific intervals using periodic pilot signals embedded in the transmission stream. Rather than continuously tracking and updating coefficients for every data symbol, the system periodically re-estimates coefficients using known pilot sequences, which provides channel adaptation while significantly reducing the computational frequency and energy consumption compared to continuous updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where the receiver monitors the residual PIM signals after cancellation and feeds this information back to adjust the polynomial coefficients. This feedback-driven adaptation allows the system to maintain accuracy by updating coefficients only when necessary based on actual cancellation performance, rather than using fixed update schedules or continuous adaptation, thus reducing unnecessary processing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12155404B2Network device and method therein for handling passive intermodulation signals in a wireless communications network
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12155404B2 patent drawing
  • US12155404B2 patent drawing
  • US12155404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for handling cancellation of a Passive Intermodulation (PIM) signal are provided. The network device has access to and controls one or more transmitters and one or more receivers. The network device applies a determined PIM model to a transmitted signal from each transmitter of the network device, to obtain a modelled signal. The PIM model comprises a forward path model for each transmitter to the PIM source, a common non-linear model of the PIM signal from the PIM source being applied to a combined signal comprising the signals from each transmitter modelled by the forward path model, and a linear reflective path model from the PIM source to each of the receivers of the network device for a received PIM signal. The network device further subtracts the modelled signal from a received signal on each of the receivers of the network device.