Child-Resistant Closure With Pinch-Actuated Locking Lugs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closure systems do not effectively prevent children from accessing and ingesting hazardous items, as they lack sufficient child-resistant mechanisms to secure lids and prevent unwanted opening.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant closure system featuring a lid and base with locking lugs and pinching members that require a specific action, such as pinching or pressing, to disengage the lugs from the base, ensuring the lid cannot be opened unintentionally, and optionally includes a tamper-evident sticker for added security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple closure system is used, then ease of operation is improved, but child safety is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of openingVSAvoidchild safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system is divided into separate functional components: a lid, a base with locking lugs, and release members. The locking lugs are segmented into multiple engagement points that must be simultaneously disengaged by the pinching action, creating a mechanism that is simple to operate for adults but resistant to child access attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closure system employs dynamic elements including spring-loaded locking lugs that automatically engage when the lid is closed and can be disengaged by applying force through the release members. The spring mechanism provides automatic resetting after opening, maintaining child safety while allowing easy adult operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent unwanted opening, then child safety is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidclosure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking and releasing functions are merged into a single integrated mechanism. The release members are positioned such that the same pinching action that disengages the locking lugs also initiates the opening sequence, eliminating the need for separate locking and unlocking mechanisms and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded locking lugs automatically engage with the base when the lid is closed, providing self-locking functionality without requiring additional actuators or complex control mechanisms. The system serves itself by using the closing motion to trigger the locking action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If locking lugs are used to secure the lid, then prevention of unwanted opening is improved, but ease of operation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelid securityVSAvoidopening ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The release members act as intermediary elements between the user's fingers and the locking lugs. By pinching the release members, the user indirectly actuates the locking lugs through a mechanical linkage, making the opening action intuitive and easy to perform while maintaining strong security during normal use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If a tamper-evident sticker is added, then security against unauthorized access is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper evidenceVSAvoidclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tamper-evident sticker is applied in advance to seal the closure and provide visual indication of tampering. This preliminary protective measure is simple to apply and remove, requiring no additional mechanical components or complex structures, yet effectively deters and detects unauthorized access attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11807425B2Child-resistant closure system
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 OBRIST CLOSURES SWITZERLAND GMBH
  • US11807425B2 patent drawing
  • US11807425B2 patent drawing
  • US11807425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child-resistant closure (10) is provided and comprises a lid (20) and a base (15). The closure comprises child-resistant locking means for preventing unwanted opening of the lid. The locking means comprising two locking members (23A, 23B) carried on or by a respective release member, the locking members engaging the base to prevent opening of the lid. The release members are movable towards each other to disengage the locking members from the base.