Physics-Informed Shape Optimization With Differentiable Material Coordinates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current classical methods for structural optimization are computationally expensive and face challenges with intricate algorithm implementation, particularly when dealing with spatial discontinuities across varied material domains, while physics-informed neural networks (PINN) struggle with gradient computation due to intrinsic continuity requirements and domain decomposition lacks differentiability.

Innovation Solution

A framework that employs neural network coordinate projection for shape optimization within PINN constructs, allowing direct mapping from a standard shape to its optimal counterpart, optimizing design objectives without transition functions or intermediate material properties, and ensuring differentiability for gradient computation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If classical structural optimization methods are used, then optimization accuracy can be achieved, but computational cost becomes excessively high and algorithm implementation becomes intricate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical optimization algorithms (such as finite element analysis-based iterative optimization) with a neural network-based system. The neural network is trained to directly predict optimal design parameters from input specifications, substituting the computational mechanics approach with a learned mapping that achieves similar accuracy with significantly reduced computational cost during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the neural network model using classical optimization methods to generate training data. Once trained, the network encapsulates the optimization knowledge and can rapidly predict optimal designs without requiring repeated expensive simulations. This preliminary action transfers the computational burden from deployment to training phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If physics-informed neural networks are used to reduce computational cost, then computational efficiency improves, but gradient computation becomes problematic due to intrinsic continuity requirements and domain decomposition issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidgradient computation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary coordinate transformation layer that maps points from a reference configuration to the deformed configuration. This intermediary transformation handles the coordinate discontinuities and material domain decomposition issues, allowing the physics-informed neural network to compute gradients smoothly without directly dealing with the discontinuities in the physical domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the problem parameters by introducing material coordinate systems and using parameterized deformation fields. By changing the parameterization approach from direct spatial coordinates to material coordinates with transformation functions, the continuity requirements are satisfied in the parameter space even when physical domains are decomposed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If domain decomposition is applied to handle multiple materials with distinct properties, then solution precision is maintained, but differentiability for gradient computation is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution precisionVSAvoiddifferentiability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a material coordinate dimension to the problem formulation. By treating material coordinates as an additional dimension alongside spatial coordinates, the method can handle multiple material domains with distinct properties while maintaining differentiability through the coordinate transformation, effectively moving the discontinuity handling to a higher-dimensional space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250259062A1Systems and methods for shape optimization of structures using physics informed neural networks
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US20250259062A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259062A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259062A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for training a shape optimization neural network to produce an optimized point cloud defining desired shapes of materials with given properties is provided. The method comprises collecting a subject point cloud including points identified by their initial coordinates and material properties and jointly training a first neural network to iteratively modify a shape boundary by changing coordinates of a set of points in the subject point cloud to maximize an objective function and a second neural network to solve for physical fields by satisfying partial differential equations imposed by physics of the different materials of the subject point cloud having a shape produced by the changed coordinates output by the first neural network. The method also comprises outputting optimized coordinates of the set of points in the subject point cloud, produced by the trained first neural network.