Pip Cap Assembly With Stainless Steel Insert

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and manufacturing complexity of traditional metal pip caps for fire protection sprinklers, such as those made from copper or brass, necessitate a more affordable and easier-to-produce alternative that maintains performance and functionality.

Innovation Solution

A pip cap assembly comprising a copper shell with a stainless steel insert, where the insert is positioned to minimize formation distance and improve performance by reducing deformation and hanging issues, while using a harder material to resist compression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional metal pip caps (copper or brass) are used, then corrosion resistance and rigidity are achieved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite structure combining zinc alloy (base material) with stainless steel insert (reinforcement). The stainless steel insert provides the necessary rigidity and corrosion resistance at the critical engagement area, while the zinc alloy body maintains overall structural integrity. This composite approach achieves the performance of traditional copper/brass pip caps at lower cost and with easier manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The stainless steel insert is strategically placed only at the engagement area where rigidity and corrosion resistance are most critical for proper seating and release. This localized reinforcement provides the necessary performance characteristics only where needed, rather than requiring the entire pip cap to be made from expensive copper or brass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If pip caps are machined for precision, then proper seating and release are achieved, but manufacturing cost increases ten times compared to stamping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The pip cap is divided into two segments: the zinc alloy body (stamped) and the stainless steel insert (separately formed then inserted). The insert contains the precision engagement features, while the main body is produced through cost-effective stamping. This segmentation allows precision features to be concentrated in a small, separately manufactured component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stainless steel insert acts as an intermediary component that provides the precision engagement features needed for proper seating and release. Instead of machining the entire zinc alloy pip cap, the insert serves as a precision intermediary that interfaces with the trigger assembly, achieving the required precision at lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If the pip cap material is softened for easier formation, then manufacturing is easier, but deformation under compression increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation easeVSAvoidresistance to deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The zinc alloy body uses a softer material for easier stamping and formation, while the stainless steel insert provides the harder, more deformation-resistant material at the critical engagement area. This local differentiation allows the bulk material to be easy to form while the critical area maintains strength and rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure combines zinc alloy (softer, easier to form) with stainless steel insert (harder, more deformation resistant). The stainless steel insert specifically addresses the deformation issue under compression while the zinc alloy body maintains ease of manufacture through stamping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP2931385B1Pip cap assembly for a fire protection sprinkler
Publication Date: 2017.05.17 VIKING
  • EP2931385B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2931385B1 patent drawingFigure 3~7

AI summary

A sprinkler assembly includes a sprinkler body having a base and a frame extending from the base. The base has a passage extending therethrough defining an inlet and an outlet. A deflector is mounted to the frame and spaced from the outlet, which is configured to deflect fluid flowing from the outlet in a radial pattern. A trigger assembly extends between the frame and the base and is adapted to support a pip cap assembly in the outlet and release the plug when a temperature associated with a fire condition is detected. The pip cap assembly includes a copper shell and a stainless steel insert received in the copper shell and extending outward therefrom.