Automated Picture-in-Picture Video Element Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for constructing Picture-in-Picture (PIP) videos are time-consuming, require expert video editors, and do not allow untrained users to easily remove or add elements independently from existing PIP videos without disturbing other elements, leading to errors.

Innovation Solution

Systems and methods that analyze video data for presentation elements, generate event logs, and re-render PIP videos to exclude or include specific elements by identifying and logging start and end times of presentation events, allowing for automated exclusion or inclusion of elements in the video rendering process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual methods are used to remove elements from PIP videos, then element removal can be achieved, but the process is time-consuming and prone to error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror-free element removalVSAvoidtime consumption for video editing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects presentation elements, generates event logs with timing information, and enables automated re-rendering based on user commands. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual frame-by-frame review, reducing both time consumption and human error while maintaining reliable element removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of video data to detect presentation elements and generates event logs containing start and end times before the actual editing process. This preliminary action prepares structured information that enables rapid, accurate re-rendering without requiring manual intervention during the actual element removal process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If expert video editors are used to construct PIP videos, then professional quality output is achieved, but the process requires specialized skills and is time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of video editingVSAvoidskill requirement for video editing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic detection of presentation elements and generates structured event logs with timing information. Users can issue simple commands to exclude or include elements based on these logs, eliminating the need for expert video editing skills while maintaining professional quality output through automated rendering processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The event log acts as an intermediary between the video data and the editing process. It contains structured information about presentation elements including start and end times, which mediates the complex task of element management into simple user commands, reducing both skill requirements and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated element detection is implemented, then editing time is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo editing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity for automated detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the video editing process into distinct functional modules: presentation element detection, event log generation with timing information, and re-rendering based on user commands. This segmentation allows automated detection to handle complex analysis while the user interface remains simple, improving productivity without requiring the user to understand system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The event log serves as an intermediary data structure that captures detection results in a standardized format with start and end times. This intermediary layer isolates the complexity of automated detection from the user interface, enabling fast editing through simple commands while the complex detection processes run automatically in the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10791298B2Controlling element presence in a video rendering
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 INTERACTIVE MEDIA LLC
  • US10791298B2 patent drawing
  • US10791298B2 patent drawing
  • US10791298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods enable rendering picture-in-picture (“PIP”) video outputs and re-rendering of the rendered video file to remove particular excluded video elements and/or add selectively included elements independently from other video elements. Input video data is analyzed for the presence of presentation elements and the portions of the video including the presentation element are tracked in an event log. A PIP output video is rendered that includes the presentation element. Upon receiving a command to exclude the presentation element, the portions of the PIP output video containing the presentation element are re-rendered to remove the presentation element from the PIP output video.