Pipe Burst Detection Using Home Telematics and Smart Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Homeowners often fail to detect leaks or bursts in pipes due to infrequent checks, leading to extensive damage, especially in less frequently used buildings or during vacations, with conventional methods being inefficient and ineffective.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing home telematics data and machine learning algorithms to detect pipe leaks or bursts, adjusting smart devices to prevent damage by increasing temperature or stopping water flow, and scheduling repairs when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If homeowners frequently check pipes to detect leaks early, then damage detection reliability improves, but time consumption and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection reliabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-monitoring of pipe conditions through embedded sensors that continuously detect leaks, temperature changes, and pressure variations without requiring homeowner intervention. The smart device autonomously processes sensor data, identifies potential issues, and triggers alerts or mitigating actions, freeing homeowners from manual inspection while maintaining high detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual visual inspection and physical checking of pipes is replaced by an automated electronic monitoring system using sensors, microcontrollers, and communication modules. The mechanical approach of physically examining pipes is substituted with electronic detection methods that continuously monitor pipe health parameters and transmit data remotely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If homeowners manually monitor pipes, then detection capability is maintained, but automation level and response efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoiddetection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor pipe conditions in real-time, the microcontroller processes the data against predefined thresholds, and the system automatically responds by sending alerts to homeowner devices or triggering mitigating actions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures high detection capability while operating autonomously without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual monitoring and decision-making processes are replaced by an automated electronic system that uses sensors to detect conditions, processes data through a microcontroller, and executes responses automatically. The system substitutes human judgment and action with electronic detection and automated control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If smart devices continuously adjust temperature to prevent pipe bursts, then pipe protection reliability improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe protection reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of freezing conditions using temperature sensors before pipes actually burst. By identifying temperature trends and potential freezing risks in advance, the system can trigger preventive actions such as sending alerts to homeowners or automatically adjusting heating, avoiding the need for continuous high-energy heating while maintaining protection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuously maintaining high temperature throughout the structure, the system applies heating selectively and partially - only in areas where pipes are located and only when freezing conditions are detected or predicted. This partial action approach reduces overall energy consumption while providing sufficient protection against pipe bursts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively detects and prevents pipe leaks or bursts by automatically adjusting smart devices, reducing damage through timely interventions.

Implementation Method 1

determining, by the one or more processors and based upon at least the home telematics data and a temperature associated with the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 2

causing one or more smart devices in the structure to increase the temperature associated with the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

causing a water flow through the one or more pipes to stop responsive to the determining that the threshold likelihood of bursting is met

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow control:

Data Source

PatentUS20260104147A1Systems and methods for detecting and preventing damage to pipes
Publication Date: 2026.04.16 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20260104147A1 patent drawing
  • US20260104147A1 patent drawing
  • US20260104147A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for detecting a leak based upon home telematics data. The method may include: (1) receiving home telematics data associated with a structure; (2) determining, based upon at least the home telematics data and a temperature associated with the structure, that a threshold likelihood of bursting is met for one or more pipes; (3) determining one or more mitigating actions to implement responsive to the threshold likelihood of bursting being met for the one or more pipes; and (4) causing the one or more mitigating actions to be implemented.