Pipe Condition Modeling for Time-Based Failure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting pipe failures in fluid networks are inaccurate due to limited historical data and the need for extensive direct inspections, failing to provide reliable estimates of both current and future pipe conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving clustering pipe sections into classes based on structural and environmental parameters, conducting condition assessments on a representative sample, and using supervised machine learning to estimate pipe conditions and predict failures with a predictive model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If direct inspection methods (visual, electromagnetic, acoustical) are used to evaluate pipe condition, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to the need to inspect each pipe individually and the inability to perform future failure predictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe condition assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pipe network into groups based on shared characteristics (material, diameter, age, environment) and performs inspections on representative samples from each group rather than every individual pipe. This segmentation allows the system to maintain measurement precision for condition assessment while dramatically improving productivity by reducing the total number of inspections required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates statistical models that copy the behavior patterns observed in inspected pipes to predict conditions of uninspected pipes. By using historical failure data and condition assessment results from sample pipes, the system generates predictive models that estimate failure probabilities for the entire network, eliminating the need to physically inspect every pipe while maintaining assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If statistical models based on historical pipe break data are used, then productivity is improved by reducing inspection needs, but measurement precision deteriorates due to lack of current pipe state information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidfailure prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where actual inspection results from representative sample pipes are continuously fed back into the statistical models. This feedback loop allows the models to be calibrated and updated with real-world condition data, ensuring that predictions for the broader network remain accurate while maintaining high productivity through reduced inspection requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the statistical models by incorporating multiple parameters including pipe material, diameter, age, environmental conditions, and observed failure patterns. By changing and expanding the parameter set used in statistical analysis, the system achieves both high productivity through efficient data utilization and high measurement precision through multi-factor predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive pipe network inspections are performed to gather sufficient data for accurate predictions, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to the extensive inspection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure probability estimation accuracyVSAvoidinspection duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by strategically selecting and inspecting representative sample pipes from each network segment before conducting full-scale predictions. This preliminary inspection of key representative pipes provides sufficient data to calibrate models and generate accurate predictions for the entire network, significantly reducing the total time required compared to comprehensive inspections of all pipes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by inspecting only the necessary portion of the pipe network (representative samples) rather than the entire network. This partial inspection approach provides sufficient data for accurate statistical modeling and failure prediction, achieving the required measurement precision while minimizing time loss by avoiding redundant inspections of all pipes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3899522B1An improved method for evaluating pipe condition
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 SUEZ INTERNATIONAL
  • EP3899522B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3899522B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3899522B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method, computer program, and device for evaluating timed-based probabilities of failure of sections of a pipe network. To do so, the pipe sections are clustered into classes based on structural and environmental parameters; within each class a sample of pipe sections are selected to be inspected. The scores that are obtained through the inspection are used to train a model of pipe conditions of pipes in a class, in order to estimate the pipe conditions of pipes that have not been inspected. The pipe conditions are used to parameterize a predictive model of pipe failures.