Pipe Defect Assessment via MFL Signal Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) techniques in the oilfield services industry provide limited information on the type and severity of pipe anomalies, making it difficult for inspectors to determine whether anomalies are due to mechanical damage, corrosion, or material discontinuities, and assessing their severity is even more challenging.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using a sensor to monitor pipe defects, outputting data to a processing system that identifies the type and severity of defects, tracks defect changes, and provides recommendations for future pipe handling based on evaluations, employing nondestructive testing (NDT) and data acquisition and analysis software, along with a standard defect database for correlation and severity assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If MFL inspection device is used to detect pipe defects, then defect detection capability is improved, but the ability to identify defect type and severity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoiddefect type and severity information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the defect characterization process into multiple independent analysis components: defect detection, defect typing, severity assessment, and growth prediction. Each component uses specific data processing techniques tailored to its function, allowing detailed analysis without requiring a single complex inspection device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary data processing system that receives raw MFL signals and transforms them into characterized defect data. This intermediary layer includes algorithms that correlate signal patterns with defect types and severities, bridging the gap between basic detection and detailed characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If basic MFL signal measurement is used, then inspection simplicity is maintained, but defect severity assessment accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection simplicityVSAvoiddefect severity assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by establishing baseline data and defect growth models before actual inspection. Historical data is pre-processed to create reference patterns for different defect severities, enabling accurate assessment without complex real-time calculations during inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where inspection results are compared against baseline data and historical records. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its severity assessments by comparing current measurements with expected patterns, improving accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive defect characterization is performed, then defect identification accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect identification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing into distinct modules: signal acquisition, anomaly detection, defect typing algorithms, severity assessment, and growth prediction. Each module handles a specific aspect of analysis independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive characterization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating digital models and representations of defect patterns from historical data. These copied patterns serve as reference templates that simplify real-time analysis, allowing the system to match current measurements against pre-characterized defect types without complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate identification and tracking of pipe defects, predicting their growth, and determining the remaining strength and service life of pipes, thereby improving pipe integrity and operational safety by providing clear defect type and severity assessments.

Implementation Method 1

Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) techniques have been used for pipe defect inspection in the oilfield services industry. An MFL based inspection device measures the flux leakage outside (around) the pipe.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux leakage: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS11029283B2Pipe damage assessment system and method
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US11029283B2 patent drawing
  • US11029283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique facilitates examination of a tubing string. A sensor is mounted to monitor a pipe for a defect or defects. The sensor outputs data on the defect to a data processing system which identifies the type and severity of the defect. The data processing system also may be used to track the defect to determine changes to the defect during, for example, subsequent uses of the pipe. Based on the evaluation of the defect, recommendations are provided with respect to future use or handling of the pipe.