Composite Pipe End Protector for Impact and Corrosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pipe end protectors for oilfield tubulars face issues such as high cost, insufficient impact resistance, and susceptibility to electrolytic corrosion, particularly during handling, transportation, and storage.

Innovation Solution

A pipe end protector comprising an engaging portion made of polymeric material, such as polypropylene, and a softer bumper portion, potentially made of thermoplastic elastomer, which are connected directly or radially to provide a robust, shock-resistant, and cost-effective solution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional plastic protectors are used, then cost is reduced, but impact resistance is insufficient due to high pipe body weight

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The protector is divided into two distinct portions: a harder engaging portion for thread engagement and a softer bumper portion for impact absorption. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function, with the bumper portion providing superior impact resistance while the engaging portion maintains cost-effective manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the protector have different material properties - the engaging portion is made of harder material for structural integrity and thread engagement, while the bumper portion is made of softer, more resilient material for shock absorption. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between cost and impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If metal protectors are used, then impact resistance is improved, but susceptibility to electrolytic corrosion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidelectrolytic corrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protector is designed as a disposable polymeric component that provides adequate impact resistance for the duration of handling and transport operations. After use, it is discarded rather than reused, eliminating the need for corrosion-resistant materials while maintaining sufficient protective function during its service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The protector uses composite polymeric materials with different hardness levels in different portions, combining the benefits of plastic (corrosion resistance) with enhanced impact absorption capabilities, thereby achieving metal-level impact resistance without the electrolytic corrosion problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The protector effectively safeguards the pipe ends against mechanical impacts and damage during handling and storage, while also resisting axial pull-off and maintaining structural integrity, even at low temperatures.

Implementation Method 1

a softer bumper portion (8), in particular made out of an elastomer, for absorbing mechanical impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The engaging portion is adapted to protect the pipe, in particular its end, and/or to connect the protector to the pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3784592B1System and protector for protecting an end of a pipe
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 KROLL PETER
  • EP3784592B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3784592B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3784592B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and a protector for protecting pipes is proposed, wherein the protector comprises a bumper portion made out of an elastomer and an engaging portion made out of a polymeric material.