Pipe End Machining Device with Autofeed Cam Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pipe machining devices require reconfiguration or manual operator intervention to cut compound bevel angles, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors in the bevel formation process.

Innovation Solution

A device with an elongate non-rotatable shaft, a rotating sleeve, and an arm that moves radially, featuring a motor-driven autofeed mechanism with a cam system to adjust the cutting tool's axial movement, allowing for automatic change of bevel angles without reconfiguring the machine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a manually operable feed screw is used to adjust the axial feed rate, then the bevel angle can be controlled, but the operation requires constant attention from the operator and increases the risk of errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebevel angle accuracyVSAvoidoperator attention required
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a programmable microprocessor to automatically control the axial feed rate of the cutting tool, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention. The microprocessor receives input from a user interface, calculates the appropriate feed rate based on the desired bevel angle, and automatically adjusts the feed screw mechanism, allowing the system to serve itself without constant human attention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical manual feed screw operation with an automated electromechanical system. A microprocessor-based control system substitutes for manual mechanical adjustment, using electronic signals to control the axial feed rate, thereby eliminating the need for constant manual monitoring and adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the feed rate is manually adjusted for different bevel angles, then different angles can be achieved, but the process takes forty-five minutes or longer and requires frequent reconfiguration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebevel angle varietyVSAvoidmachining speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the axial feed rate based on the desired bevel angle through programmable control. Instead of static manual adjustment, the microprocessor dynamically calculates and applies the appropriate feed rate ratio between axial movement and rotational movement, allowing rapid adaptation to different bevel angles without manual reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from manual mechanical adjustment to electronic programmable control. The microprocessor stores and retrieves different feed rate parameters corresponding to various bevel angles, allowing rapid parameter changes without physical reconfiguration of the machining system, thereby increasing productivity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a fixed axial feed rate is used, then the machine operation is simplified, but only a single bevel angle can be cut without reconfiguration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine operation simplicityVSAvoidbevel angle flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The microprocessor-based control system provides multi-functionality by enabling the same machining mechanism to produce multiple different bevel angles through programmable feed rate adjustment. The system universally handles various bevel angle requirements without requiring physical reconfiguration, maintaining ease of operation while adding versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the appropriate axial feed rate based on the desired bevel angle before the machining operation begins. The microprocessor pre-determines the correct feed rate ratio and programs it into the control system, so when machining starts, the correct parameters are already in place, eliminating the need for manual reconfiguration during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and accurate machining of compound bevels without operator intervention, reducing the time required for bevel formation and minimizing errors by automatically adjusting the cutting tool's angle through a controlled autofeed mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

The rotating sleeve has an annular cam surface thereon that moves a cam follower mounted on the housing. Movement of the cam follower is converted into rotational movement that rotates a gearing connected to the feed screw for advancing the sleeve along the shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

A portion of the shaft has a threading and a feed screw rotates on the threading for axially advancing the sleeve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 3

A motor rotates the sleeve and the arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric motor:

Data Source

PatentUS10137504B2Pipe end machining device with axial autofeed
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US10137504B2 patent drawing
  • US10137504B2 patent drawing
  • US10137504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for preparing the end of a pipe includes a non-rotatable mandrel one end of which is attachable to the pipe. A motor rotates a sleeve around the mandrel and the sleeve retains an arm perpendicular to the mandrel for cutting the pipe. A cam surface on the rotating sleeve moves a cam follower. Movement of the cam follower is converted to rotational movement for turning a feed nut threaded on the mandrel. The rate at which the sleeve is advanced by the feed nut is controlled by limiting the movement of the cam follower.