Movable Pipelayer Counterweight for Fore-Aft Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pipelayer machines face instability and tipping issues due to the uneven distribution of weight during heavy lifting, particularly in fore-aft directions, which current counterweight systems do not adequately address, limiting their lifting capacity and maneuverability in rugged terrains.

Innovation Solution

A movable counterweight system that can be selectively extended or retracted from the side of the pipelayer machine to adjust its center of gravity in forward, rearward, and lateral directions, allowing for improved stability and increased lifting capacity by actively managing the machine's weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the pipelayer machine is made larger and heavier to satisfy higher lifting capacities and boom lengths, then the lifting capacity is improved, but the footprint, maneuverability, and transportation capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The counterweight system is made dynamically adjustable rather than fixed. The counterweight can be selectively deployed and repositioned along the counterweight boom to change the center of gravity in fore-aft direction, allowing the machine to adapt its stability characteristics to different lifting scenarios without increasing overall size

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A counterweight system with counterweight assembly and counterweight boom is introduced to offset the tipping moment created by the load. The counterweight can be positioned to provide fore-aft stability in addition to the traditional lateral stability, enabling higher lifting capacities without increasing the machine's footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Power

If the undercarriage and boom are oversized to increase lifting capacity, then the lifting capacity is improved, but the manufacturing costs and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of oversizing the undercarriage and boom structures to handle higher loads, a counterweight system is used to provide the necessary stability. This allows the use of smaller, more cost-effective structural components while achieving the same lifting capacity through active center of gravity management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Data Source

PatentUS11814269B2Counterweight system for lifting machines
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11814269B2 patent drawing
  • US11814269B2 patent drawing
  • US11814269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile pipelayer machine includes a machine chassis having a forward end, a rear end, a first side, and a second side, and a boom extending from the first side of the machine chassis. The mobile pipelayer machine also includes a movable counterweight system extending from the second side of the machine chassis, the movable counterweight system being selectively movable to change a center of gravity of the machine in at least one of a forward or a rearward direction.