Double-Sampled Pipeline ADC Midpoint Latching Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pipelined ADCs face limitations in conversion efficiency due to the sacrifice of hold time for strobe time, requiring very fast comparators to achieve high efficiency, which leads to potential noise issues and differential nonlinearity errors.

Innovation Solution

The proposed double-sampled pipeline ADC system latches intrastage digital quantization signals approximately midway between the leading and trailing edges of clock signals, allowing for extended time to resolve disturbances and reducing the need for extremely fast comparators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If end sampling comparison is used with leading edge clock triggering, then data throughput is increased by double sampling, but hold time is sacrificed for strobe time thereby limiting conversion efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoidhold time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic timing by using two different clock edges (leading edge for sampling, trailing edge for comparison) to create flexible timing windows. This allows the system to adapt the hold time and strobe time dynamically within each clock cycle, optimizing both throughput and conversion efficiency simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic double sampling by utilizing both the leading and trailing edges of alternating clock cycles. This periodic use of both clock edges enables the system to achieve double data throughput while maintaining adequate hold time through proper phase alignment of the sampling and comparison operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Loss of time

If hold time is extended to improve conversion efficiency, then noise susceptibility and differential nonlinearity errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehold timeVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the comparison operation during the hold period rather than at its end. By triggering the comparison on the trailing edge of the clock cycle (after sampling is complete but during hold time), the system allows the signal to settle completely before comparison begins, eliminating noise susceptibility and differential nonlinearity errors while maintaining adequate hold time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If very fast comparators are used to reduce strobe time, then conversion efficiency improves, but device complexity and potential noise issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrobe timeVSAvoidcomparator speed requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic timing by utilizing the trailing edge of the clock cycle for comparison operations. This dynamic approach effectively extends the available comparison time without requiring faster comparators, as the comparison occurs during the hold period when the signal is already stable, thereby reducing strobe time requirements while maintaining conversion efficiency with standard comparator speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7283083B1Pipelined analog-to-digital converter with mid-sampling comparison
Publication Date: 2007.10.16 NAT SEMICON CORP
  • US7283083B1 patent drawing
  • US7283083B1 patent drawing
  • US7283083B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A double-sampled pipeline analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) system and method in which latching of the intrastage digital quantization signals occurs approximately midway the leading and trailing edges of the clock signals.