Pipeline Evaluation Device for ML Data and Random Number Dependencies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pipeline evaluation methods fail to comprehensively assess the performance and risk of machine learning pipelines, particularly due to lack of mechanisms for evaluating data and random number dependencies, which affect pipeline behavior over time.

Innovation Solution

A pipeline evaluation device and method that acquire time series data, execute the pipeline, and calculate evaluation metrics based on profit and loss to evaluate the entire pipeline, including data and random number dependencies, and optimize the pipeline accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If pipeline parameters are adjusted individually, then parameter optimization is achieved, but overall pipeline performance evaluation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimizationVSAvoidoverall pipeline performance evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into multiple independent evaluation units, each responsible for evaluating specific components (data generation unit, pipeline execution unit, metric calculation unit). This allows individual parameter optimization while maintaining overall pipeline evaluation capability through coordinated operation of segmented units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is designed as a universal framework that can evaluate different pipeline configurations and parameters through a common set of evaluation units. The metric calculation unit universally calculates various evaluation metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score) for different pipeline scenarios, enabling both parameter optimization and overall performance evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If traditional evaluation methods are used, then evaluation simplicity is maintained, but comprehensive pipeline assessment including data and random number dependencies is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidcomprehensive pipeline assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive evaluation is segmented into distinct evaluation units: data generation unit for evaluating data quality, pipeline execution unit for running pipeline configurations, and metric calculation unit for computing performance metrics. Each unit handles a specific aspect of evaluation, maintaining operational simplicity while achieving comprehensive assessment through their coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pipeline execution unit acts as an intermediary between data generation and metric calculation, executing pipeline configurations with specific data and random number seeds. This intermediary layer enables comprehensive evaluation of pipeline behavior under different conditions while maintaining a clear, structured evaluation process that preserves simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If pipeline configurations are changed to improve performance, then adaptability is enhanced, but evaluation of performance and risk before operation becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline adaptabilityVSAvoidperformance and risk evaluation before operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system performs preliminary evaluation of pipeline configurations before actual operation. The pipeline execution unit executes test configurations with evaluation data, and the metric calculation unit calculates performance metrics in advance. This preliminary action enables assessment of both performance and risk before deploying pipeline configurations to production, supporting informed decision-making for adaptable pipeline design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240211367A1Pipeline evaluation device, pipeline evaluation method, and program
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 NEC CORP
  • US20240211367A1 patent drawing
  • US20240211367A1 patent drawing
  • US20240211367A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a pipeline evaluation device, a data acquisition means acquires time series data. A pipeline execution means executes a pipeline using the data being acquired, and generates an execution result. A metric calculation means calculates an evaluation metric using the execution result acquired by executing the pipeline by using the execution result, and outputs an evaluation result.