Pipeline Grouping by Convex Polygon Expansion in Pipe Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for grouping pipelines in pipe networks, such as replacing high-priority pipelines, are inefficient, complex, and lack reproducibility, especially when pipelines are scattered, and manual computer mapping based on experience is unreliable for large-scale networks.

Innovation Solution

A pipeline grouping apparatus and method that automatically groups pipelines by setting base points, generating polygons, and updating base points iteratively to encompass pipelines, using area and length criteria to evaluate suitability, and ensuring convex polygons to maintain efficient grouping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual grouping operation is performed based on worker experience, then grouping results can be obtained, but the operation is very complicated and requires a certain amount of time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping operationVSAvoidtime and effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical grouping operations with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to perform clustering. The system automatically processes pipeline data, calculates distances, and generates grouping results without requiring manual intervention, thereby eliminating the time and effort previously required for manual grouping operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automation where the computer automatically performs the entire grouping process based on input data and predefined algorithms. The system serves itself by automatically calculating distances between pipelines, determining clusters based on distance thresholds, and generating results without human intervention, making the process efficient and reproducible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual grouping operation is performed based on worker experience, then grouping results can be obtained, but the grouping results lack reproducibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping resultsVSAvoidgrouping operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective manual judgment with objective computer-based algorithms. The system uses standardized distance calculations and clustering algorithms that produce consistent, reproducible results regardless of who operates the system. This eliminates the variability inherent in manual experience-based grouping while maintaining operational simplicity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If pipelines are grouped manually using computer mapping, then some grouping can be achieved, but it is difficult to group an entire large-scale pipe network managed by municipalities at once

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping throughputVSAvoidgrouping system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large-scale pipe network into manageable clusters based on spatial proximity. The system divides the entire network into multiple groups where each group contains pipelines that are close to each other, allowing the large network to be processed in manageable portions while maintaining overall connectivity and spatial relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces spatial dimensionality into the grouping process by calculating distances between pipelines in two-dimensional space. This allows the system to automatically group pipelines based on their spatial relationships, enabling efficient processing of large-scale networks by utilizing geometric properties rather than manual sequential analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If worker manually operates computer mapping system, then grouping can be performed, but there is no way to evaluate suitability of the results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping suitabilityVSAvoidevaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that automatically evaluate grouping suitability by calculating and analyzing various metrics. The system provides feedback on clustering quality, distance distributions, and group characteristics, allowing automatic adjustment and optimization of grouping parameters to ensure suitable results are achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260017424A1Pipeline grouping apparatus, pipeline grouping method, and pipeline grouping program
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 KUBOTA CORP
  • US20260017424A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017424A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017424A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pipeline grouping apparatus includes: a pipeline information memory device configured to store pipeline information associating pipeline identification information with pipeline attribute information; a base point setting unit configured to set a base point for grouping to any of a plurality of pipelines to be grouped based on the pipeline information; a polygon generation unit configured to repeat a process of generating a polygon of a prescribed shape encompassing one pipeline including the base point and a candidate pipeline adjacent to the base point until a preset specified condition is satisfied, and group each pipeline encompassed by the polygon into a same group; and a grouping control unit configured to repeat grouping processing by the polygon generation unit until all the pipelines constituting the pipe network are grouped into any group, thereby dividing the pipe network into a plurality of groups.