Pipeline Closed-Loop Control for Hydrate and Phase Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing petroleum pipeline systems face challenges in managing hydrate formation, phase transitions, and pipeline fractures due to variations in temperature, pressure, and composition, leading to operational inefficiencies and potential damage.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop control system using sensors and material models to adjust temperature, pressure, and composition in real-time, employing controllable pipeline elements to maintain the gas within desired phases and minimize hydrate formation, thereby reducing the likelihood of fractures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time closed loop control is implemented to maintain gas in desired phases and prevent hydrate formation, then pipeline reliability and safety are improved, but system complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting hydrate formation risk and phase transitions before they occur. The control system uses material models and sensor data to anticipate problematic conditions, allowing preventive control decisions to be made before hydrates form or phase transitions cause issues, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex reactive measures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The closed-loop control system continuously monitors temperature, pressure, and composition sensors, compares actual conditions against desired phases and hydrate formation boundaries, and automatically adjusts pipeline operations. This feedback mechanism maintains reliability through automated real-time adjustments rather than complex manual intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and material models are deployed for real-time monitoring and control decisions, then measurement precision and control accuracy are improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor measurement precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple sensors (temperature, pressure, composition) and material models into a unified multi-functional platform that performs diverse functions: monitoring gas properties, predicting phase transitions, assessing hydrate formation risk, and generating control decisions. This universal system achieves high measurement precision across multiple parameters while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges sensor data acquisition, material modeling, phase transition prediction, and control decision-making into an integrated control architecture. By combining these previously separate functions into a single coordinated system, the patent achieves comprehensive measurement precision while reducing overall system complexity through unified data processing and centralized control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If controllable pipeline elements are used to adjust temperature, pressure, and composition, then productivity and operational efficiency are improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline throughputVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies partial actions by making targeted, minimal adjustments to temperature, pressure, and composition only when and where needed to maintain desired phases and prevent hydrates. Rather than continuously maximizing heating or pressurization, the system applies the minimum necessary control actions to achieve productivity goals, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining pipeline throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes energy consumption by dynamically changing operational parameters (temperature, pressure, composition) based on real-time conditions and predicted phase behavior. Material models predict the most energy-efficient parameter adjustments to maintain gas in desired phases, allowing the system to achieve high productivity while minimizing the energy required for heating, pressurization, and composition management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4244688B1Systems and methods for optimization of a petroleum distribution system
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 SENSIA LLC
  • EP4244688B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4244688B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4244688B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for operating a pipeline system includes obtaining sensor data of a gas in the pipeline system from sensors of a sensing unit. The method also includes performing a real-time and closed loop control scheme using the sensor data and a material model of the gas to determine one or more control decisions. The method also includes operating one or more controllable pipeline elements to adjust a temperature, a pressure, a flow rate, or a composition of the gas according to the one or more control decisions.