Observability Pipeline Load Balancing via Least In-Flight Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Observability pipeline systems face challenges in efficiently balancing computing resources across varying task durations, leading to uneven resource allocation and prolonged processing times for certain computing jobs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a dispatch criterion that allocates computing resources based on the least in-flight task principle, ensuring that tasks are distributed to available worker roles with the fewest ongoing tasks, thereby balancing workload across computing jobs and optimizing processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computing resources are allocated using traditional methods, then resource allocation simplicity is maintained, but resource allocation balance deteriorates leading to uneven distribution and prolonged processing times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddispatch criterion complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dispatch criterion dynamically adjusts resource allocation based on real-time system state. The leader role continuously monitors worker role task statuses and adapts task assignment decisions according to current in-flight task counts, transforming static resource allocation into a dynamic, responsive process that optimizes processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where worker roles report their task execution status back to the leader role. The leader role uses this feedback information about current in-flight task counts to make informed dispatch decisions, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously optimizes resource allocation balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If additional computing resources are added to handle longer tasks, then processing capacity increases, but system cost and resource requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob completion speedVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the coordination function into a single leader role that manages multiple worker roles. By consolidating dispatch intelligence in the leader role and using centralized decision-making based on global system state, the system achieves efficient resource utilization without requiring additional computing resources, instead optimizing the use of existing workers through intelligent task assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the allocation parameter from fixed or static resource assignment to dynamic assignment based on in-flight task count. This parameter change enables the same computing resources to be flexibly reallocated between tasks, improving job completion speed without increasing the quantity of computing resources required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If tasks are distributed evenly across worker roles, then resource utilization appears balanced, but processing time worsens due to ignoring task duration variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall processing timeVSAvoidtask distribution simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The dispatch criterion intentionally creates asymmetric task distribution by assigning tasks based on current in-flight task counts rather than evenly distributing them. This asymmetric approach accounts for task duration variations and worker role differences, optimizing overall processing time by balancing workload in terms of task count rather than simple even distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12067419B1Load balancing computing resources in an observability pipeline system
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 CRIBL INC
  • US12067419B1 patent drawing
  • US12067419B1 patent drawing
  • US12067419B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Load balancing processes are performed in an observability pipeline system comprising a plurality of computing resources. In some aspects, the observability pipeline system defines a leader role and worker roles. A plurality of computing jobs each include computing tasks associated with event data. The leader role dispatches the computing tasks to the worker roles according to a least in-flight task dispatch criteria, which includes iteratively: identifying an available worker role; identifying one or more incomplete computing jobs; selecting, from the one or more incomplete computing jobs, a computing job that has the least number of in-flight computing tasks currently being executed in the observability pipeline system; identifying a next computing task from the selected computing job; and dispatching the next computing task to the available worker role. The worker roles execute the computing tasks by applying an observability pipeline process to the event data associated with the respective computing task.