Automatic Pipeline Parameter Tuning via Iterative Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual tuning of parameters in processing pipelines is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human errors, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

An automatic pipeline tuning system that automatically optimizes parameters in a pipeline by accepting input representations of the pipeline and datasets, using preprocessing, parameter search, and evaluation modules to find optimal parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual parameter tuning is performed, then developers can control pipeline behavior, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter tuning accessibilityVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the pipeline automatically performs parameter tuning without human intervention. The automation module iteratively modifies parameters, executes the pipeline, and evaluates results autonomously, freeing developers from manual tuning tasks while achieving optimal parameters efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual process of parameter tuning with an automated computational system. The automation module uses algorithms to systematically explore parameter spaces and evaluate pipeline performance, substituting human manual operations with automated computational processes that are faster and more consistent

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual parameter tuning is performed, then developers can assess output, but significant resource capacity is utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput assessment accuracyVSAvoidresource capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The automation module performs partial exploration of the parameter space by focusing on the most promising parameter combinations identified through iterative evaluation. Rather than exhaustively testing all possible parameters, the system performs targeted adjustments and assessments, reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining effective tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If manual parameter tuning is performed, then developers can modify parameters, but the pipeline operates at less than optimal efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter modification capabilityVSAvoidpipeline efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where the automation module continuously monitors pipeline output quality and uses this information to guide subsequent parameter adjustments. The evaluation module assesses each parameter configuration's impact on output, and this feedback directs the next tuning iterations, ensuring the pipeline converges toward optimal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250200354A1Automatic optimization of data processing pipelines using machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250200354A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200354A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200354A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches are disclosed that can automatically tune parameters in an application pipeline. An application pipeline and datasets with labels can be accepted as input. An application pipeline can include various modules and information such as their interconnections and a set of parameters to be tuned. The input data can be fed into a preprocessing module and then fed into a parameter search module, which can navigate through the parameter space and search for improved and/or optimal parameters. The search can progress to informed selections based on outcomes of previous evaluations. The parameters identified can be used by an execution module to execute the pipeline. The results produced can be evaluated by an evaluation module that condenses its findings into a single score, which is passed back to a parameter search module to inform the next round of parameter predictions. Such an iterative process can continue until certain criteria are met, with final output corresponding to a set of automatically tuned parameters.