Deployment Pipeline Security Engine for Early Vulnerability Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As program code is deployed across various platforms, it faces different security vulnerabilities due to platform-specific differences, making it challenging to identify and remediate security flaws before deployment, which can lead to data breaches, identity theft, and reputational damage.

Innovation Solution

A security engine integrated into application deployment pipelines analyzes application elements using multiple engines to identify security issues, generate recommendations, and automatically update code or design to mitigate vulnerabilities, leveraging machine learning for improved efficiency and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple security engines are used to analyze application code, then security detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security analysis system is divided into multiple specialized security engines, each responsible for detecting specific types of vulnerabilities. This segmentation allows each engine to focus on particular security concerns (e.g., injection attacks, authentication flaws) thereby improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The security engine is designed with multi-functionality to perform various security analysis tasks including static code analysis, dynamic analysis, and vulnerability assessment. This universal approach allows a single integrated system to handle diverse security requirements without requiring separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If security analysis is performed on all application elements, then security coverage is improved, but analysis time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial analysis by focusing security scanning on critical application elements and high-risk code paths rather than analyzing every single line of code uniformly. This approach maintains comprehensive security coverage for essential components while reducing overall analysis time by applying selective analysis depth based on risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary security analysis during the development and build phases before deployment. By conducting security checks early in the CI/CD pipeline, the system identifies vulnerabilities before they reach production, reducing the need for extensive post-deployment analysis and accelerating overall security validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If automated security remediation is implemented, then security response speed is improved, but risk of false positives increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity response speedVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The automated remediation system incorporates feedback loops where security findings are validated through multiple analysis passes and cross-referenced with known vulnerability databases. The system learns from false positives and negatives, adjusting its detection thresholds and remediation actions based on historical data and developer corrections, thereby improving response speed while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260059000A1Security engine for application deployment pipelines
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20260059000A1 patent drawing
  • US20260059000A1 patent drawing
  • US20260059000A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a device may generate an application creation graphical user interface. The device may receive, via the graphical user interface, one or more user inputs associated with specifying a set of elements of an application; information identifying the application including information identifying the set of elements of the application, each element, of the set of elements, being associated with a corresponding codebase. The device may parse, using at least one security engine of a plurality of security engines, a codebase of an element, of the set of elements, to identify whether the application is associated with a security issue satisfying a threshold severity. The device may generate, based on identifying that the application is associated with the security issue satisfying the threshold severity, a security recommendation relating to the element. The device may transmit an output including information identifying the security recommendation relating to the element.