Building Piping Leak Detection via Isolation and Purging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for hydrostatic testing of piping systems in buildings often fail to accurately locate leaks, especially in complex systems, and cannot efficiently isolate and test entire systems independently of municipal systems.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the isolation of the main piping system, removal of fixtures and P-traps, purging to eliminate air, sealing outlets, filling to a predetermined elevation, and inspecting for leaks after a set period, which may include line tracing and dye testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional hydrostatic testing methods are used around sections of a building, then testing can be performed, but the precise location of leaks cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak location precisionVSAvoidtesting method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The piping system is divided into isolated sections by closing off valves and disconnecting fixtures, allowing each section to be tested independently. This segmentation enables precise localization of leaks within specific sections rather than only determining general leak presence in the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A dye solution is introduced as an intermediary substance that flows through the piping system and makes leak locations visible through color changes in the surrounding materials. This intermediary enables precise visual detection of leak positions without requiring complex electronic detection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the piping system is not isolated from the municipal system, then the system remains connected to external supplies, but the system cannot be tested in its entirety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem testing capabilityVSAvoidisolation procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The isolation procedure is performed as a preliminary step before conducting the hydrostatic test. Valves are closed and fixtures are disconnected in advance to create a sealed, isolated system that can be thoroughly tested without interference from external municipal water supplies or drainage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The piping system is extracted from the municipal system by closing off the main supply valve and disconnecting from the municipal water and drainage systems. This extraction allows the building's internal piping system to be tested independently as a complete, isolated unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If fixtures and P-traps are not removed, then the piping system retains its operational components, but air becomes entrapped and testing accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidpreparation work
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Fixtures and P-traps are removed from the piping system before testing to eliminate air entrapment issues. This extraction of components ensures that the testing fluid can flow freely through the entire piping system without being blocked by air pockets, thereby improving testing accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The removal of fixtures and P-traps is performed as a preliminary preparation step before the actual hydrostatic test. This advance removal prevents air entrapment during testing and ensures accurate leak detection, though it does require additional preparation work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for comprehensive leak detection in piping systems, ensuring thorough testing of entire systems or sections, improving accuracy and efficiency in identifying leaks and maintaining system integrity.

Implementation Method 1

filling the piping system up to a predetermined elevation... inspecting the piping system for leaks after a predetermined period of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

After removal of the building fixtures and/or P-traps, a line trace and/or a dye test may optionally be implemented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDye testing: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS11530960B1Method of testing for leaks in the piping system of a building
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 PLUMBING DIAGNOSTICS CORP
  • US11530960B1 patent drawing
  • US11530960B1 patent drawing
  • US11530960B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of testing for leaks within substantially the entirety of a piping system of a building or a section thereof. The method comprises isolation of a main of the piping system and removal of the building fixtures. Optionally, a line trace and/or a dye test may be implemented. The method further comprises purging the piping system to at least partially reduce or eliminate entrapped air. The method further comprises sealing the plumbing outlets of the piping system and filling the piping system up to a predetermined elevation above a highest fitting connection or up to the highest serviceable point of the system. The method further comprises inspecting the piping system for leaks after a predetermined period of time, which may be anywhere from immediately after filling the piping system to about twenty minutes thereafter.